NOTE: Some content may not display correctly, including tables and figures. See PDF for full details.
Republic of the Marshall Islands
NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN 2015–2017
June 2014
© EPPSO, June 2014. Republic of the Marshall Islands
This document is available for re-publication and public use. Any modification of any kind is strictly prohibited without the expressed permission of the Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO).
Map of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT
His Excellency President Loeak
It gives me great pleasure and privilege to present to all stakeholders, the RMI National Strategic Plan, (NSP). This Instrument provides for the RMI development strategies for the next three year period, (2015–2017).
As our young nation faces difficult challenges in its daily activities and planning, we tend to look to the past for guidance for the present and future, to ensure that we steady the course towards progress and self-sufficiency. The NSP is such the instrument steadying the course and navigating us toward this goal.
The development of this National Strategic Plan was accomplished through joint collaborative efforts of governmental ministries, agencies, businesses, as well as private sector entrepreneurs, nongovernmental organizations, and numerous others in civil society, who shared in one goal and objective aiming to ensure that the course and future of RMI is steered toward self-sustainability and efficiency.
As President, I strongly encourage stakeholders to allocate sufficient resources to support the implementation of the development goals and objectives identified in the National Strategic Plan, for the continued development of good governance and a vibrant Marshallese society.
I extend to the RMI development partners, especially the United Nations Development Fund and the Asian Development Bank, the warm gratitude and appreciation of the Government, and the people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, for their full on-going support and assistance, towards the implementation and progress of the National Strategic Plan.
I encourage stakeholders to come together in the spirit of joint collaboration and efforts, as enshrined in the words of our forefathers, “Jepelpelin Ke Eju Kaan”, to achieve successful results and progress of RMI national priorities, in order to ensure a greater and brighter future for our young nation. Please accept the assurances of my highest gratitude.
Christopher J. Loeak President
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands wishes to thank the National Strategic Plan Steering Committee for their guidance and oversight in designing and developing this document. The Steering Committee was led by the Chief Secretary. Other members of the Committee include the Secretary of Finance, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, the Director of Economic Policy Planning and Statistics Office, the Director of the Office of Compact Implementation, the President of the Marshall Islands Mayors Association, and representatives from the Office of Attorney General, the Private Sector and the Non-Governmental Organization Community.
Special appreciation is given to the Marshall Island Government’s line Ministries, Agencies and State Owned Enterprises, and most importantly, all of Marshallese society for their valuable input and contributions to the development of this National Strategic Plan.
RMI government would also like to acknowledge the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Fiji for sponsoring the Technical Assistance Team, comprised of Chris M. Yanckello, for their assistance in preparing this document. The Government also wishes to acknowledge the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for their assistance in printing this document and providing technical assistance for the initial implementation of the National Strategic Plan, including the development of the National Strategic Plan Electronic Platform found at www.eppso.org.
Acknowledgement is also extended to the staff of the College of the Marshall Islands and EPPSO for their efforts in reviewing and preparing this publication.
All photographs used by permission.
For further information on the material contained in this report, please contact:
Government of the Marshall Islands Economic Policy Planning and Statistics Office Office of the President PO Box 7 Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 96960
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................. ix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................xiii
1. SNAPSHOT OF THE RMI......................................................................................................................... 1
2. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 2
3. NSP COMPONENTS AND NSP TIMELINE ............................................................................................... 5
NSP Components ................................................................................................................................... 5
NSP Timeline ......................................................................................................................................... 6
4. RMI BACKGROUND OVERVIEW............................................................................................................. 7 Government .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Economy ................................................................................................................................................ 7
Geography ............................................................................................................................................. 8
People .................................................................................................................................................... 9
5. NATIONAL PLANNING HISTORY IN THE RMI ....................................................................................... 12
History ................................................................................................................................................. 12
6. ORGANIZATION OF THE NSP ............................................................................................................... 13
7. COORDINATION OF THE NSP WITHONGOING PLANNINGAND BUDGETING .................................... 15
8. NSP NATIONAL CONTEXT AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEMES.................................................. 17
Vision 2018 and NSP National Context ............................................................................................... 18
9. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN VISION ............................................................................................ 22
Vision Statement ................................................................................................................................. 23
10. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 24
NSP Objective ...................................................................................................................................... 24
11. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR.......................................................................................................... 25
SECTOR OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 26
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 29
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES........ 32
12. ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY SECTOR............................................................ 34
SECTOR OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 34
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 38
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AN RESILIENCY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES................................................................................................................ 40
13. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECTOR ........................................................................................ 42
SECTOR OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 43
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 47
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 50
14. SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTOR ............................................................................ 52
SECTOR OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 53
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 57
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 60
15. GOOD GOVERNANCE SECTOR............................................................................................................. 63
SECTOR OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 64
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 69
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND GOOD GOVERNANCE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES........... 72
16. HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT................................................................................... 74
17. NSP IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ....................................................................................... 75
NSP Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (M&E) Overview ......................... 75
Monitoring Methodology .................................................................................................................... 76
Summary of NSP Monitoring and Evaluation Framework .................................................................. 77
ANNEX 1.............................................................................................................................................. 79
ANNEX 2.............................................................................................................................................. 85
ANNEX 3.............................................................................................................................................. 89
ANNEX 4............................................................................................................................................ 101
ANNEX 5............................................................................................................................................ 109
ANNEX 6............................................................................................................................................ 111
ANNEX 7.............................................................................................................................................131
ANNEX 8 ............................................................................................................................................ 133
ANNEX 9............................................................................................................................................ 145
ANNEX 10.......................................................................................................................................... 147
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ACRONYM DEFINITION
ADB Asian Development Bank AG Attorney General ALRO Alab Lebje Relatives Organization AMI Air Marshall Islands ANZ Australian and New Zealand APSC Australian Public Service Commission ATT Arms Trade Treaty BOMI Bank of the Marshall Islands BPOA Barbados Plan of Actions CAP Comprehensive Adjustment Program CBGS Community Based Governance System CCA Climate Change Adaptation CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CFC Chlorofluorocarbons CMAC Coastal Management Advisory Council CMI College of the Marshall Islands CNMI Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands CPI Consumer Price Index CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child CROP Council of Regional Organizations of the Pacific CRPD Convention on the Rights of Person with Disability CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty DAC Development Assistance Committee DHS Demographic Health Survey DOT Direct Observation Therapy DRM Disaster Risk Management DUD Darrit-Uliga-Delap ECM Enhanced Consultative Mechanism EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ELA English Language Arts EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPPSO Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office EU European Union FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FFE Food for Education FIC Forum Island Countries FMM Financial Management Model FSM Federated States of Micronesia FY Fiscal Year GAO Government Accountability Office GDI Gender Development Index GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gases
ACRONYM DEFINITION
GNI Gross National Income HDI Human Development Index HIPC Heavily Indebted Poor Countries HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome HPI Human Poverty Index HRD Human Resource Development HRH Human Resource for Health HRM Human Resource Management HRMIS Human Resource Management Information System ICT Information and Communications Technology ILO International Labor Organization IWRM Integrated Water Resource Management JNAP Joint National Action Plan KAJUR Kwajalein Atoll Joint Utility Resources M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MAWC Majuro Atoll Waste Company MBC Marshalls Broadcasting Company MCG Forum Ministerial Contact Group on Fiji (MCG MDGs Millennium Development Goals MDRI Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative MEC CRP Marshalls Energy Company Comprehensive Recovery Plan MEC Marshalls Energy Company MICNGOS Marshall Islands Council of Non-Governmental Organizations MICS Marshall Islands Conservation Society MIDB Marshall Islands Development Bank MIJ Marshall Islands Journal MIMA Marshall Islands Mayors’ Association MIMRA Marshall Islands Marine Resources Authority MIR Marshall Islands Resort MISAT Marshall Islands Standard Achievement Test MISC Marshall Islands Shipping Corporation MISGLB Marshall Islands Scholarship, Grant and Loan Board MISSA Marshall Islands Social Security Administration MIVA Marshall Islands Visitors Authority MMR Measles, Mumps, Rubella (triple cocktail vaccination) MOE Ministry of Education MOF Ministry of Finance MOFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MOH Ministry of Health MOIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MOJ Ministry of Justice MPW Ministry of Public Works MSI Mauritius Strategy of Implementation MTBIF Medium Term Budget and Investment Framework MWSC Majuro Water and Sewer Company NCCPF National Climate Change Policy Framework NCDs Non Communicable Diseases
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. INTRODUCTION
The National Strategic Plan (NSP) of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) has been developed using a collaborative process among government ministries and agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the private sector.
The NSP is designed as a framework to coordinate the articulated medium term development goals and objectives of the RMI government at the national level. The NSP will be used by government leaders as the roadmap for development and progress in the medium term (2015–2017) and will be continually updated for use in meeting longer term objectives as the RMI moves towards the scheduled completion of The Compact of Free Association, as Amended funding in 2023.
The NSP will enable RMI government leaders to articulate the direction of priorities over the coming three year period, in anticipation of 2023. RMI government, through the NSP, can now clearly outline the chronological pathway for implementation of national priorities.
Electronic Platform
The NSP is designed as a dynamic document. Going forward, the NSP will be housed on an electronic platform. The NSP document is to be web-based and located on an internet website at the Economic Policy Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO). EPPSO will serve as the gatekeeper for revisions and updating links in the NSP. Ministries and agencies will provide EPPSO with updates so that the NSP continually reflects “real time” policies, activities and accomplishments. The NSP will be accessible on line to all stakeholders for review and for information.
The web-based NSP includes hyper-links to ministry and agency strategic plans, national policy documents and monitoring matrixes that can be used to monitor progress. The hyper-links also provide donors and other interested stakeholders with information to make decisions regarding NSP planning, implementation and progress.
The NSP hyper-links also provide links to the NSP implementation matrixes. These implementation matrixes will be used by EPPSO to monitor and evaluate progress regarding NSP implementation. EPPSO will also use these matrixes to prepare an annual progress report.
NSP Timeframe
The initial NSP outlook is three years (FY15–17).The NSP has been developed in coordination with the RMI planning and budgeting cycle. As such, the NSP is designed as a three-year rolling plan.
Three-year rolling plans are updated annually during the annual budget process. The NSP will be updated annually during the same time so that it reflects current and ongoing goals and priorities. This includes adding an additional year forward to the plan during each budget cycle in keeping with the rolling format.
Although the NSP is developed with an initial three year timeframe, it must also be forward looking to the year 2023. At that time, grant funding from The Compact of Free Association, as Amended is scheduled to end.
B. ORGANIZATION OF THE NSP
The National Strategic Planning Steering Committee (SC), appointed by the Cabinet, played a significant role in the development, design and organization of the NSP. The SC presented the idea that the National Plan be built around the design concept of 1-5-3. The SC maintained that the design concept of 1-5-3 provides for a plan that is straightforward, with a user friendly format. The 1-5-3 design follows this pattern:
(1) Clear concise objective
(5) Sectors with development objectives, aligned with ten National Development Themes
(3) Year rolling plan framework resulting in a dynamic plant that can be updated in accordance with the annual budgeting process
NSP Sectors
The NSP includes five sectors with each sector broken down into several related strategic areas. The strategic areas are intended to coordinate with national policies and ongoing and/or planned strategic plans in the RMI government ministries, agencies and SOEs. The Sector Diagram that follows provides an overview of the five sectors and related strategic areas.
C. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN VISION
The NSP Vision considers both the RMI Constitution and Vision 2018. The development of the NSP Vision focuses on continuing to build a resilient, productive and self-supportive RMI. As such, it is founded on the attributes of self-reliance, mutual respect, tolerance and integrity in line with constitutional obligations and international promises.
The RMI NSP Vision Statement:
The NSP Vision encompasses all the priorities, targets and policies that make up the ongoing efforts at development in the RMI and is consistent with the forward looking approach the government is taking with the development and implementation of this NSP.
D. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
The RMI Planning Guide, drafted by EPPSO in 2009, defines objectives as:
Objective – The term objective refers to a planned outcome or end result that is to be achieved
at some future time as a result of social or economic development.
The objective of the NSP is successful national development that reflects success in all aspects of Marshallese society including economic, political, social and cultural areas. The objective addresses the needs, views and concerns of all Marshallese so that as progress occurs, each individual has a shared and common stake in national development.
In this way, the people and the culture of the Marshall Islands are the source of inspiration for the priorities of the NSP. Through successful implementation, the NSP moves Marshallese society so that all citizens can achieve their potential through opportunities provided by strategic and organized sustainable development at both national and local levels. The NSP Objective:
This objective empowers each citizen with both responsibility and opportunity. Through the successful implementation of the NSP, every citizen can expect to enjoy improved quality of life in all areas including (but not limited to), health, education, energy, food security, law and order, gender equality, employment opportunities and disaster mitigation. Furthermore, this empowerment is more deeply broadened by the embracing of culture as a unifying force for sustainable development of the Marshall Islands.
E. NSP NATIONAL CONTEXT AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEMES
Developing the NSP National Context
Vision 2018 is crucial to the development of the NSP national context. Other national planning documents and reports as well as international information including The Pacific Plan Annual Progress Report, 2012 were also critical to the development of the national context. Stakeholder consultations and inputs were also essential to the development of the NSP national context. A list of documents referenced is located in Annex 3. A directory of stakeholders consulted is in Annex 10.
Vision 2018 and NSP National Context
Vision 2018 provides the RMI with a long range view of national context and perspective. This national context continues to provide relevant national priorities.
A review and analysis of the goals of Vision 2018 is located in Annex 4. The analysis resulted in the development of ten National Development Themes and corresponding National Goals and National Targets. The following table provides a visualization of the alignment of the ten National Development Themes with the corresponding National Goals and Targets.
Furthermore, an individual matrix has been designed for each respective sector providing the correlation of the Over-Arching Development Objectives in each sector with the ten National Development Themes.
NSP National Development Themes
The NSP was developed with the understanding of the importance of the enabling conditions outlined in Vision 2018 to national development. Through analysis of Vision 2018 and with stakeholder inputs, a series of ten broad National Development Themes have been developed providing the NSP with a national perspective. The ten National Development Themes are:
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national governments.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic, environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
The National Development Themes will be used as macro-indicators regarding NSP progress. By aligning Over-Arching Development Objectives for each sector with the National Development Themes the RMI will be able to monitor NSP implementation and progress in a national context.
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government
• Communication across and among making dialogue
• Cultural identity and traditional practice as an integral part of all decision making
• Effective decision government leaders
• Cultural identity and traditional practice as an integral part of all decision making
• Paperless offices way work is processed
• E-Government is the
• More timely decision-making and information dissemination
• Improve access and dissemination of all relevant information
• Government electronic filing system
• Speedy and impartial law enforcement
• Impartial legal system
• Accountable and transparent judiciary
• Fisheries and marine resources used efficiently coordinated with
• Regulatory compliance
• Water and resources used efficiently sustainable development
• Deep sea mining addressed
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic, environment governance and infrastructure
• Decrease dependence on foreign economic security
• Economic and financial
and technical assistance
• Rules and regulations encouraging and participation in
• Private sector growth
expansion of private sector and job creation economic development
• Access to job opportunities on all atolls
• Rules and regulations encouraging foreign climate
• Favorable investment
investment
• Vulnerable groups mainstreamed for access services and
• Equitable access to all necessary areas of society opportunities
- Small business opportunities for all atolls
- Agriculture extension in outer islands (coconut replanting and other programs)
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local
• Building patriotism and national identity and traditional knowledge to address
• Maintain traditional
- Respecting religion and maintain peace and emerging challenges facing people, family and spiritual harmony in society communities and governments values
• Cultural security
• All society active in promoting and preserving Marshallese culture
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility
• Traditional Leaders continue to oversee responsibility
• Traditional and cultural traditional law
• Traditional Courts continue resolve land issues
• Traditional and
• Active Council of Iroij constitutional freedoms
• Active Traditional Leaders protected
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities
• High quality education
• Student enrollments and attendance available
- Student results addressed
- Teacher quality addressed
- Community partnerships
- Technical education programs providing workforce
Competitive and skilled workforce development
Secure high quality
• Focus on NCDs health care
- Preventive health care addressed
- Hospital services addressed
- Outer island health care addressed
F. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Social Development Sector is comprised of five strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Ministry of Health Strategic Plan and the National Gender Policy.
NSP National Priorities and Social Development Sector Development Objectives
The table below provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with the Social Development Sector Over-Arching Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (1A-1E). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
G. ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY SECTOR
The Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector is comprised of three strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Climate Change Policy or the Environmental Protection Authority Strategic Plan.
NSP National Priorities and the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector Development Objectives
The following table provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (2A-2C). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
H. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Infrastructure Development Sector is comprised of five strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the National Energy Policy or the Ministry of Transportation and Communication Strategic Plan.
NSP National Priorities and Infrastructure Development Sector Development Priorities
The following table provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Infrastructure Development Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (3A-3E). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
I. SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Sustainable Economic Sector is comprised of six strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the RMI National Trade Policy or the Ministry of Resources and Development Strategic Plan.
NSP National Priorities and Sustainable Economic Sector Development Objectives
The following table provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Sustainable Economic Development Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (4A-4F). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
J. GOOD GOVERNANCE SECTOR
The Good Governance Sector is comprised of six strategic areas:
- Public Financial Management and Reform (5B)
- Law, Justice and Public Safety (5C)
(5) Good Governance
- Legal and Regulatory (5D)
- SOE Management and Reform (5E)
- Macroeconomic Planning (5F)
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Public Safety Strategic Plan or the draft Tax Reform Legislation.
NSP National Priorities and Good Governance Sector Development Objectives
The following table provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Good Governance Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (5A-5F). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
K. HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Human resource capacity development is identified throughout the RMI government as a cross cutting issue for all ministries and agencies. For this reason this issue is detailed in a standalone section.
The Public Service Commission (PSC) and the National Training Council (NTC) are currently working on several facets of Human Resource Development (HRD) for the RMI public service and for the general population of the RMI. PSC is focusing on the following:
- Public Service Commission Workforce Plan
- RMI Public Service Strategic Development Plan
- Human Resource Information Management System (HRMIS)
- Human Resource Management (HRM) System Framework Development
- Human Resource Development (HRD) System Framework Development
- Remuneration and Classification System Reform
- Expansion of PSC roles and functions in championing Good Governance Principles
- Strategically redesigning/re-structuring of PSC
The NSP is designed to coordinate with the ongoing PSC HR reform initiatives. The NSP electronic platform will include hyper-links that will link stakeholders to all ongoing work in HRD for both the PSC and NTC.
L. NSP IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
NSP Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (M&E)
EPPSO is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the NSP. The NSP is designed to be webbased and housed at EPPSO. The web-based NSP provides for a dynamic document that can be updated on a regular basis. Real time monitoring will be conducted using the NSP electronic platform.
EPPSO serves as the gatekeeper for updating progress of the NSP and updating links to all relevant information. Ministries and agencies will provide EPPSO with updates so that the NSP electronic platform reflects “real time” information. This NSP electronic platform is to be accessible to all stakeholders for review and for information. In addition to providing the necessary platform to conduct M&E in real time, the electronic platform also:
- Provides, for the first time, a “one-stop shop” for all RMI and international stakeholders to find real time information regarding government planning, budgeting, legislation, and international commitments
- Provides access, in real time, for Ministers and other government officials to review ongoing progress with regard to implementing the NSP and related plans, budgets and policies.
- Underscores that it is imperative that all government plans and policies are updated so that the most up to date information is available.
- Emphasizes the critical role of EPPSO pertaining to planning and with regard to monitoring NSP implementation and progress.
The NSP electronic platform includes hyper-links to ministry/agency strategic plans, national policy documents, RMI international and regional agreements and other relevant information such as the 2011 RMI Census. This platform also includes links to an additional range of information including links to other RMI websites. With this menu the NSP electronic platform provides government, donors and other interested parties with information, in real time, not only of NSP progress, but also of ongoing progress in other areas of government.
The electronic platform also provides links to the NSP implementation matrixes. These implementation matrixes will be used by EPPSO, and government leaders, to monitor and evaluate progress regarding NSP implementation. EPPSO will also use these matrixes to prepare an annual progress report. An example of the NSP implementation matrixes is located in Annex 1.
The implementation matrixes are coordinated with ministry/agency strategic plans and budgets. This provides for a two-tiered M&E framework. The NSP implementation matrixes provide the initial level of monitoring (National/Tier 1). The matrixes include the following information regarding the Over-Arching Development Objectives:
- NSP over-arching development objective
- NSP ministerial objectives
- Issues to address (development challenges)
- Medium term strategies
- Medium term outcomes
- Medium term indicators and targets (developed by implementing agencies and EPPSO)
- Budget information
- Links to relevant planning and policy documents
Additionally, hyper-links to individual strategic plans in each RMI ministry/agency provide the secondary level of M&E (Ministerial/Tier 2), providing a further drill down of details regarding implementation and progress of the Ministerial Development Objectives including:
- Implementing activities (specific activities linked to medium term strategies)
- Short term outcomes/milestones (specifically lined to medium term outcomes)
- Short term indicators(where possible to monitor changes in shorter terms)
- Responsible divisions (and positions)
- Coordination responsibilities (external and internal of ministry/agency, other stakeholders)
- Specific funding amounts and sources of funding
- Timeframes
This two tiered M&E framework provides the RMI government and all stakeholders the opportunity to see both a broad view (medium term) of progress, and also a more targeted view (short term/annual). EPPSO will prepare an annual NSP progress report. This report will provide a status update for each sector and also will include an update regarding the NSP status vis-à-vis selected core indicators located in Annex 8. Reporting on specific data in the areas of health, education and environment is currently provided by relevant ministries on a quarterly basis, this is expected to continue.
SNAPSHOT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS
2. INTRODUCTION
The National Strategic Plan (NSP) of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) has been developed using a collaborative process among government ministries and agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the private sector.
The NSP is designed as a framework to coordinate the articulated medium term development goals and objectives of the RMI government at the national level. The NSP will be used by government leaders as the roadmap for development and progress in the medium term (2015–2017) and will be continually updated for use in meeting longer term objectives as the RMI moves towards the scheduled completion of The Compact of Free Association, as Amended funding in 2023.
The NSP will enable RMI government leaders to articulate the direction of priorities over the coming three year period, in anticipation of 2023. RMI government, through the NSP, can now clearly outline the chronological pathway for implementation of national priorities.
NSP Overview
The NSP was Developed in Coordination with Current and Ongoing Ministry and Agency Plans
In addition to reviewing relevant planning and policy documents information was also gathered through a series of stakeholder consultations (large forums, smaller strategic group forums and individual meetings with stakeholders). The NSP brings together this input with ongoing planning, strategies and policies into a coordinated national framework for development. Using the identified priorities in RMI ministry and agency plans and national policies, the NSP provides clear identification of RMI priorities.
The Initial NSP Outlook is Three Years (FY15–17)
The NSP is developed in coordination with ongoing planning in the RMI. Planning in the RMI is primarily completed through a three-year rolling plan framework. The NSP is designed as a three-year rolling plan to coordinate with the rolling plans in RMI ministries and agencies.
Three-year rolling plans are designed to be updated on an annual basis, concurrent with the annual budgeting cycle. As a rolling plan, the NSP will be updated prior to the beginning of each fiscal year (as part of the budget process). By following this annual cycle, the NSP will reflect current and ongoing goals and priorities.
The NSP is Forward Looking
Even though the NSP is developed with an initial three year outlook, it is also forward looking to the year 2023. At that time funding from The Compact of Free Association, as Amended is scheduled to end.
At the end of every three year period (2015–2017), (2018–2020) and (2021–2023), a national “stocktake” will be completed in order to determine progress and to make necessary adjustments and revisions for the medium term (three years) based on progress and accomplishments.
The NSP National Context is Based on the Development Objectives as Detailed in Vision 2018 and Relevant Information from Selected National/International Documents, Plans and Reports
The Vision 2018 Master-plan (Vision 2018), completed in 2001, defined where the RMI planned to be by the year 2018 in terms of sustainable development. Vision 2018 presented long term goals, objectives and strategies, which were developed through an extensive consultative process. In addition to Vision 2018, other documents were used to develop the NSP national context including, but not limited to, the RMI Peer Review, The Barbados Plan of Action, The RMI Millennium Development Goals Progress Report 2009 and The RMI National Report for Small Island Development States (SIDS).
The NSP is a Dynamic Document
The NSP is designed as a dynamic document rather than a static document. Going forward, the NSP will be housed on an electronic platform. The NSP document is to be web-based and located on an internet website at the Economic Policy Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO). EPPSO will serve as the gatekeeper for revisions and updating links in the NSP. Ministries and agencies will provide EPPSO with updates so that the NSP continually reflects “real time” policies, activities and accomplishments. The NSP will be accessible on line to all stakeholders for review and for information.
The web-based NSP includes hyper-links to ministry and agency strategic plans, national policy documents and monitoring matrixes that can be used to monitor progress. The hyper-links also provide donors and other interested stakeholders with information to make decisions regarding NSP planning, implementation and progress.
The NSP is Monitored through Implementation Matrixes
The NSP hyper-links also provide links to the NSP implementation matrixes. These implementation matrixes will be used by EPPSO to monitor and evaluate progress regarding NSP implementation. EPPSO will also use these matrixes to prepare an annual progress report. An example of a NSP implementation matrix is located in Annex 1.
The Electronic NSP Platform Provides National Linkages to the Status of all Ongoing Ministry and Agency Plans
The NSP electronic platform addresses several national issues including:
• Providing, for the first time, a “one-stop shop” for all RMI and international stakeholders to find real time information regarding government planning, budgeting, legislation, and international commitments.
• Providing access, in real time, for Ministers and other government officials to review ongoing progress with regard to implementing the NSP and related plans, budgets and policies.
• Underscoring that it is imperative that all government plans and policies are updated so that the most up to date information is available.
• Emphasizing the critical role of EPPSO pertaining to planning and with regard to monitoring NSP implementation and progress.
3. NSP COMPONENTS AND NSP TIMELINE
NSP Components
The components of the NSP provide information regarding the coordination of priorities, objectives and milestones at the national level. The body of the NSP includes:
RMI Background Information: Information to provide RMI perspective
- Overview of RMI government, economy, geography and people
- Overview of planning and national planning in the RMI (since 1991)
Organization of the NSP: Organization and introduction to the NSP sectors and strategic areas
Links to Ongoing Planning and Budgeting: The NSP is linked to the Medium Term Budget and Investment Framework (MTBIF), ongoing government strategic plans and annual budgets
NSP National Context: Overview of the design of the national development themes that provide the over-arching national perspective and priorities of the NSP
NSP Vision Statement: Broad vision based on the RMI Constitution and Vision 2018
NSP Objective: The objective for successful National Development
NSP Sectors and Strategic Areas: Information in each sector includes: 1) listing of relevant documents, 2) sector development challenges, 3) sector development objectives, and 4) sector indicators. There is also a brief overview of each strategic area.
Additionally, in the electronic NSP document, hyper-links will provide access to the implementation matrixes. The implementation matrixes include the following:
- NSP over-arching development objective
- NSP objectives
- Issues to address (development challenges)
- Medium term strategies
- Medium term indicators and targets (developed by implementing agencies and EPPSO)
- Budget information
- Links to relevant planning and policy documents
Human Resource Development (HRD): HRD capacity issues crosscut every NSP sector. Currently, the Public Service Commission (PSC) is developing information and plans regarding human resource management to be used at the national level in coordination with the NSP.
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E): The M&E framework is performance based, incorporating Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), locally focused indicators, and a set of international core indicators. The M&E framework is designed to meet the monitoring needs regarding evaluation of NSP implementation. Baseline data from various national and international sources will be used for M&E purposes. Indicators are designed to be results based. EPPSO and the government agencies will be responsible for identifying relevant indicators for M&E purposes. All data used for M&E is projected to be collected consistently and on a regular basis.
NSP Timeline
The initial NSP outlook is three years (FY15–17). The NSP has been developed in coordination with the RMI planning and budgeting cycle. As such, the NSP is designed as a three-year rolling plan.
Three-year rolling plans are updated annually during the annual budget process. The NSP will be updated annually during the same time so that it reflects current and ongoing goals and priorities. This includes adding an additional year forward to the plan during each budget cycle in keeping with the rolling format.
Although the NSP is developed with an initial three-year timeframe, it must also be forward looking to the year 2023. At that time, grant funding from The Compact of Free Association, as Amended is scheduled to end.
In order to continue to “look forward”, a national stock-take will be completed at the end of every three-year period (2015–2017), (2018–2020) and (2021–2023). This stock take will be conducted to review progress and accomplishments during the previous three years. The stock-take will also consider the proposed development objectives for the next three years. At that time, any major revisions that are necessary based on changes to national priorities, funding realities, progress and accomplishments will be added to the NSP.
4. RMI BACKGROUND OVERVIEW
Government
Citizens of RMI live under a democratic political setup combined with a hierarchical traditional culture.
In July 1977, the Marshall Islands voted in favor of separation from the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands and in May 1979, it declared self-government under its own constitution. In March 1982, the Marshall Islands declared itself a Republic and in September 1991, the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) became a member of the United Nations.
The government is modeled after the British Westminster parliamentary system with a bi-cameral legislature composed of two houses; the Council of Iroij (Chiefs) and the Nitijela (Parliament) with the Council of Iroij sitting as the upper house and the Nitijela sitting as the lower house. The Council of Iroij, comprised of 12 traditional leaders, does not have legislative or executive power, but can make comments on bills in reference to customary law and other traditional practices. Legislative power rests in the Nitijela, consisting of the 33 senators elected by universal suffrage of citizens above the age of 18.
The President is elected from within the Nitijela. Executive power is exercised by the President and the Cabinet. Members of the Cabinet are selected by the President and must be members of the Nitijela. At the municipal level, each atoll has a local government comprised of an elected Mayor and Council.
Economy
The remoteness of the RMI from major markets historically has had a negative impact on the economy. Furthermore, the economy is small in relative terms, with a narrow export base and limited production capacities. As such, it is vulnerable to external shocks. The economy remains dependent on donor funding, with funding from The Compact of Free Association, as Amended providing approximately 50% of the FY14 budget. (FY14 Ministry of Finance)
Employment data shows that the economy has generated a number of additional jobs amounting to 0.6% per annum during the period of The Compact of Free Association, as Amended. Both the private and public sectors have grown, despite declines at the Kwajalein military base. However, the generation of additional jobs has been insufficient to provide gainful employment opportunities for those seeking work, and outward migration remains substantial, averaging 1.7% annually since 2004. (USDA Graduate School 2012)
The RMI public sector continues to dominate the economy in terms of contribution to GDP and overall employment. The primary commercial industries include:
- Wholesale/retail trade
- General business services
- Commercial fisheries
- Construction
- Tourism
- Light manufacturing
Table 1 provides employment data from the 2011 RMI Census:
Annual export values continue to increase primarily due to continued exports of tuna by locally based fishing operations. However, the RMI continues to rely heavily on imports and continues to run a negative balance of payments. The primary export products include:
- Frozen fish (tuna)
- Topical fish
- Ornamental clams and corals
- Coconut oil and copra cake
- Crafts
Geography
The RMI is located in the northern Pacific Ocean. The RMI is comprised of 29 coral atolls and 5 coral islands with a total land mass of approximately 180 sq. km (70 square miles). The land rises over 6,000 meters from the ocean floor to no more than two meters above the surface. Due to this geography the RMI is always vulnerable to tidal surges and large waves.
The archipelagic islands are spread over an ocean area of 750,000 square miles in two roughly parallel chains: the “Ratak” (Sunrise) and the “Ralik” (Sunset). Table 2 provides basic RMI land characteristics.
Source: World Bank 2012
The RMI is isolated with a distance of approximately 2,300 miles from Honolulu, 1,900 miles from Guam and 2,800 miles from Tokyo. Geographically, the nearest neighbors are the nations of Kiribati and the
Federated States of Micronesia. As the land is not very nutrient rich, the agricultural base is rather limited. However, the marine resources base is large.
The RMI Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) encompasses approximately 2.1 million sq. Km (1.3 million sq. miles). Approximately 50% of the EEZ borders international waters with the remaining 50% bordering the FSM, Nauru, Kiribati and Enen Kio (Wake Island). (Secretariat of the Pacific Community, 2004)
People
The RMI is a sovereign nation in “Compact of Free Association” with the United States. The first Compact of Free Association was signed in 1983 and continued in force through 2003. The Compact of Free Association, as Amended entered into force on May 1, 2004, and is in effect through 2023.
The 2011 RMI Census recorded a total population of 53,158. The two urban atolls: Majuro and Kwajalein (Ebeye Island) are home to approximately 74% of the population in 2011. The remainder is scattered over the other atolls and islands. Table 3 below provides details.
* According to the 2011 RMI Census, 352 Rongelapese were relocated to Mejatto island on Kwajalein Atoll.
The population increases rapidly due a fertility rate at around 4.1%. The RMI continues to rank high in the Pacific with regard to population density with an average household size of 6.8 persons per
household. (2011 RMI Census)
Principal population indicators are provided in Table 4.
The fact that 40% of the population is 15 years of age or younger leads to critical negative impacts on health, education, youth and employment policies. Furthermore, migration of Marshallese to the United States and other countries, taking with them their skills and talents, impacts the direction and implementation of employment and other policies and also influences cultural and traditional practices and values.
5. NATIONAL PLANNING HISTORY IN THE RMI
History
The RMI has a history of development planning. RMI development planning first started in 1986 with a focus on the beginning of the first Compact of Free Association with the U.S. Commencing with this initial planning effort, the RMI has continued to be committed to sustainable development through the design and implementation of national and sector planning strategies.
The first RMI Five Year Plan was developed for the period 1986–1991.
The Second Five Year Plan followed immediately after that on through 1996. This second five year plan was considered the second phase of the fifteen year development plan under the first Compact of Free Association.
The Third National Development Plan was for the period 1996–2001 and included the Public Sector Investment Program which was a follow up to the 1995–97 Policy Reform Program
(RMI Concept Paper, UNDP 2010).
Further background information on RMI planning history is located in Annex 2.
6. ORGANIZATION OF THE NSP
NSP Steering Committee Oversight
The National Strategic Planning Steering Committee (SC), appointed by the Cabinet, played a significant role in the development, design and organization of the NSP. The SC presented the idea that the National Plan be built around the design concept of 1-5-3. The SC maintained that the design concept of 1-5-3 provides for a plan that is straightforward, with a user friendly format. The 1-5-3 design follows this pattern:
(1) Clear concise objective
(5) Sectors with development objectives, aligned with ten National Development Themes
(3) Year rolling plan framework resulting in a dynamic plant that can be updated in accordance with the annual budgeting process
NSP Sectors
The NSP includes five sectors with each sector broken down into several related strategic areas. The strategic areas are intended to coordinate with national policies and ongoing and/or planned strategic plans in the RMI government ministries, agencies and SOEs. Diagram 1 provides an overview of the five sectors and related strategic areas.
DIAGRAM 1: NSP SECTORS AND STRATEGIC AREAS
7. COORDINATION OF THE NSP WITH ONGOING PLANNING AND BUDGETING
Performance Based Budgeting
The RMI government has been implementing Performance Based Budgeting (PBB) in selected ministries since 2003. Ministries receiving grants from The Compact as Amended were the first ministries to implement PBB. PBB is a performance management tool that improves accountability by emphasizing performance. PBB promotes government transparency by providing clear and direct linkages among funding (budgets), results and impacts. The Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) provides information necessary for government managers to map expenditure to performance. This allows for ongoing monitoring of performance with regard to funding.
Strategic Planning
In coordination with the implementation of PBB, selected ministries create, implement and annually update three-year rolling strategic plans. Rolling plans are designed to:
- Allow for annual updates and revisions
- Provide effective platforms to address changing priorities and issues
- Include timelines
- Address medium term funding priorities
The three-year rolling strategic plans are a crucial starting point for the development of the NSP and will be the key to successful implementation. Furthermore, the use of the MTBIF as a guide to future funding availability is critical to the success of the NSP.
The three-year rolling strategic plans, in coordination with the annual PBS, present a solid outlook of government funding priorities. These plans are linked to, and coordinated with, this NSP and provide a critical foundation of priorities, strategies, targets and indicators. The NSP is designed to reflect the goals, objectives and priorities of the ministries with the aim of improving information flow among all stakeholders. This will help to ensure coordination and effective use of planning and budgeting tools, and the coordination and implementation of priorities at the all levels of government.
NSP Informed by MTBIF, Ministry Plans and Annual Budgets
Diagram 2 provides an illustration of the coordinated flow of information among the NSP, the MTBIF, the ongoing three-year rolling strategic plans and the annual PBS.
DIAGRAM 2: PLANNING AND BUDGETING FLOW CHART
8. NSP NATIONAL CONTEXT AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEMES
Developing the NSP National Context
Vision 2018 is crucial to the development of the NSP national context. Other national planning documents and reports as well as international information including The Pacific Plan Annual Progress Report, 2012 were also critical to the development of the national context. Stakeholder consultations and inputs were also essential to the development of the NSP national context. A list of documents referenced is located in Annex 3. A directory of stakeholders consulted is in Annex 10.
Vision 2018 and Enabling Conditions for Development
As Vision 2018 stated there are ten enabling conditions necessary to reach the RMI development objectives. The enabling conditions, as in 2001, are still relevant to development in the RMI. The ten enabling conditions are:
- Sound system of governance with political stability and a competent, honest public service.
- High investment in education and research.
- Fostering a culture of high savings, investment and productivity.
- The ability to take advantage of emerging global trends.
- Effective and responsible economic and financial institutions.
- Facilitation of equitable development in the outer islands.
- Strengthening the spirituality of the Marshallese people.
- More harmonized development in the context of healthy lifestyles, the prevailing culture and sustainable environment. Fostering fundamental change in the attitudes and behavior of all citizens, governments, businesses, public corporations, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs).
Effective partnership and coordination among national government, local governments, NGOs, the private sector and civil society and the citizens.(Vision 2018)
RMI National Development Challenges
Progress with regard to Vision 2018 enabling conditions continues, however this progress persists in being impacted by ongoing development challenges facing the RMI. These development challenges were outlined in the December 2010 Concept Paper on the RMI National Development Plan and Strategies 2011–2015:
• Limited national resource base
• Remoteness of atolls/islands
• Increasing urbanization and urban unemployment
• Limited access to international Markets
• Limited land development
• Limited social development progress
• Limited human, financial and technical resources
• Limited social security base
• High cost of living
• Narrow economic base
• High cost of doing business
• External debt challenges (affecting traditional macro-economic structure)
• Climate change threats and challenges
Vision 2018 and NSP National Context
Vision 2018 provides the RMI with a long range view of national context and perspective. This national context continues to provide relevant national priorities.
A review and analysis of the goals of Vision 2018 is located in Annex 4. The analysis resulted in the development of ten National Development Themes and corresponding National Goals and National Targets. Table 5 provides a visualization of the alignment of the ten National Development Themes with the corresponding National Goals and Targets.
Furthermore, an individual matrix has been designed for each respective sector providing the correlation of the Over-Arching Development Objectives in each sector with the ten National Development Themes.
NSP National Development Themes
The NSP was developed with the understanding of the importance of the enabling conditions outlined in Vision 2018 to national development. Through analysis of Vision 2018 and with stakeholder inputs, a series of ten broad National Development Themes have been developed providing the NSP with a national perspective. The ten National Development Themes are:
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national governments.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic, environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
The National Development Themes will be used as macro-indicators regarding NSP progress. By aligning Over-Arching Development Objectives for each sector with the National Development Themes the RMI will be able to monitor NSP implementation and progress in a national context. Table 5 illustrates the flow of the ten National Development Themes with the National Goals and Targets. This flow moves left and right, for example, as National Targets are met, the corresponding National Goals are attained, leading to the realization of the National Development Themes. On the other hand, the National Development Themes provide guidance with regard to the National Goals and Targets.
9. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN VISION
The NSP Vision is founded on the Constitution of the Marshall Islands and the Vision 2018 “Declaration to the Marshallese.”
Preamble of the RMI Constitution
WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS, trusting in God, the Giver of our life, liberty, identity and our inherent rights, do hereby exercise these rights and establish for ourselves and generations to come this Constitution, setting forth the legitimate legal framework for the governance of the Republic.
We have reason to be proud of our forefathers who boldly ventured across the unknown waters of the vast Pacific Ocean many centuries ago, ably responding to the constant challenges of maintaining a bare existence on these tiny islands, in their noble quest to build their own distinctive society.
This society has survived, and has withstood the test of time, the impact of other cultures, the devastation of war, and the high price paid for the purposes of international peace and security.
All we have and are today as a people, we have received as a sacred heritage which we pledge ourselves to safeguard and maintain, valuing nothing more dearly than our rightful home on the islands within the traditional boundaries of this archipelago.
With this Constitution, we affirm our desire and right to live in peace and harmony, subscribing to the principles of democracy, sharing the aspirations of all other peoples for a free and peaceful world, and striving to do all we can to assist in achieving this goal.
We extend to other peoples what we profoundly seek from them: peace, friendship mutual understanding, and respect for our individual idealism and our common humanity.
Declaration to the Marshallese
“To become a country in an inter-dependent world, with an enhanced socio-economic reliance (and) an educated, healthy, productive, law-abiding and God-loving people in which individual freedom and fundamental human rights are protected and culture and traditions are respected, and development and environmental sustainability are in harmony.”
Vision Statement
The NSP Vision considers both the RMI Constitution and Vision 2018. The development of the NSP Vision focuses on continuing to build a resilient, productive and self-supportive RMI. As such, it is founded on the attributes of self-reliance, mutual respect, tolerance and integrity in line with constitutional obligations and international promises.
The RMI NSP Vision Statement:
The NSP Vision encompasses all the priorities, targets and policies that make up the ongoing efforts at development in the RMI and is consistent with the forward looking approach the government is taking with the development and implementation of this NSP.
10. THE NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
The RMI Planning Guide, drafted by EPPSO in 2009, defines objectives as:
Objective – The term objective refers to a planned outcome or end result that is to be achieved at some future time as a result of social or economic development.
The objective of the NSP is successful national development that reflects success in all aspects of Marshallese society including economic, political, social and cultural areas. The objective addresses the needs, views and concerns of all Marshallese so that as progress occurs, each individual has a shared and common stake in national development.
In this way, the people and the culture of the Marshall Islands are the source of inspiration for the priorities of the NSP. Through successful implementation, the NSP moves Marshallese society so that all citizens can achieve their potential through opportunities provided by strategic and organized sustainable development at both national and local levels.
NSP Objective
This objective empowers each citizen with both responsibility and opportunity. Through the successful implementation of the NSP, every citizen can expect to enjoy improved quality of life in all areas including (but not limited to), health, education, energy, food security, law and order, gender equality, employment opportunities and disaster mitigation. Furthermore, this empowerment is more deeply broadened by the embracing of culture as a unifying force for sustainable development of the Marshall Islands.
11. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Social Development Sector is comprised of five strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Ministry of Health Strategic Plan and the National Gender Policy.
SECTOR DOCUMENTS AND PLANS
Strategic plans, national policies and other relevant documents related to the Social Development Sector are listed in Table 6. These plans and policies are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform.
SECTOR OVERVIEW
Since the start of the Compact as Amended in 2004, the RMI has focused a large proportion of this funding in the areas of education and health.
Health
The health care system in the RMI mainly consists of two hospitals, one in Majuro and one in Ebeye, and fifty eight (58) health care centers in the outer atolls and islands. The hospitals are equipped to provide mainly primary and secondary care, and are limited in the ability to offer tertiary care. Patients needing additional care are usually referred to Honolulu or the Philippines. These referrals consume a large portion of the health sector budget.
The Ministry of Health (MOH) continues to focus on reaching the MDGs and have seen improvements in some health indicators focusing on maternal and child mortality. However, the total fertility rate (4.1, 2009–2011) remains high, and the adolescent birth rate (85 per 1000 women aged 15–19, 2009–2011) also remains high.
As per The RMI Millennium Development Goals Progress Report 2009, the RMI is on target to meet MDG targets 4A, 5A and 5B. However, the report concludes that the RMI is not on track to meet MDG Targets 6A, 6B and 6C and at that time, the report concluded that the RMI would not meet these targets by 2015.
Diabetes-related diseases continue to be the leading cause of death in the RMI. Urbanization and overcrowding in some urban areas also have brought about the rise of specific communicable diseases, including tuberculosis and leprosy. Additional health information from the 2011 RMI Census is located in Annex 5.
Education
The Ministry of Education (MOE) supervises the implementation and delivery of public education (K-12). There are a number of private schools operating in the Marshall Islands however the public education system accommodates a large majority of students. The MOE is focused on meeting the MDG target for providing universal primary education by 2015. The 2011 RMI Census provides information on the status of education in the RMI. Included in the census findings regarding education are the following:
- 71.4% of people aged 25 or older had started and completed high school
- 80% of children ages 5–9 are attending school (year prior to census)
- 92% of children ages 10–14 are attending school (year prior to census)
- 38% of youth 15–24 are attending school (year prior to census)
This illustrates that while access to education is available, school attendance and access to education do not always go hand in hand. Additional education information from the 2011 RMI Census is located in Annex 5.
Gender
The RMI National Gender Policy is designed to advance gender equality and ensure women in the RMI have an enabling environment to enjoy their human rights. This will be done through the development of laws, policies, procedures and practices to ensure mainstreaming of gender issues into all spheres of government programs and services. The policy maintains that this is the business of the whole of government (including the parliament and local government entities).
Youth
The first attempt at formulating a National Youth Policy was in 1995. Due to lack of funding and other issues, implementation was inconsistent. The process for reviewing the policy started again in 2005 and in 2010, the RMI National Youth Policy was finalized. It was endorsed by the Cabinet and further adopted by the Nitijela in March 2011.
The policy, though designed to cover the period 2009 to 2014, has only been partially implemented and is without an approved implementation plan. In April 2012, the RMI government requested support from the UNDP to design an implementation plan and costing framework to set the stage for effective implementation of the RMI National Youth Policy. A national workshop of stakeholders was held in Majuro in August 2012 to design the plan inclusive of a costing framework for implementation. The resulting implementation plan and costing framework covered the period January 2013 to December 2014. It is anticipated that leading up to its expiry date, the RMI National Youth Policy will be revised and a 2015 to 2020 RMI National Youth Policy will replace the current policy.
Children
RMI ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) in 1993. By agreeing to undertake the obligations of the Convention, the RMI has committed to protecting and ensuring children's rights, and also have agreed to hold themselves accountable for this commitment before the international community.
Disabled Individuals
The RMI Constitution (Section 12) provides for equal protection and freedom from discrimination but it does not refer directly to disability or People with Disability (PWD). Section 15 of the Constitution recognizes the right of people to health care, education and legal services.
The RMI National Policy on Disability Inclusiveness Development was drafted in 2013 and includes an action plan and matrix. The stated goal of the policy is:
The RMI becomes a barrier-free society that respects the rights of all persons with disabilities by empowering, including and providing them with the means of achieving their rights.
Community Development
Community development, like many strategic areas is cross-cutting. The Ministry of Internal Affairs (MOIA) has a Division of Community Development that includes a “Mobile Team” that has the purpose of working in the RMI communities. This unit works with other ministries including MOH and the Ministry of Resources and Development (R&D) to provide community development in all atolls in the areas of health, agriculture, environment and aquaculture issues.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
Table 7 provides an overview of the development challenges for each strategic area in the Social Development Sector. The identification of these challenges is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Social Sector Development Challenges.
The development challenges provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHY the RMI government has prioritized specific Over-Arching Development Objectives in this sector.
Those development challenges in bold are in essence considered to be the Over-Arching Development Challenges for each strategic area. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Challenge is given further detail through Ministerial Development Challenges that directly relate to specific ministries and agencies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 8 provides an overview of the development objectives for each strategic area in the Social Development Sector. The identification of these development objectives is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Social Sector Development Objectives.
The development objectives provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHAT issues the RMI government has prioritized in this sector.
Those development objectives in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Objectives for each strategic area and are numbered in sequence for the entire sector. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Objective is given further detail through Ministerial Development Objectives that directly relate to specific ministries and agency plans.
SECTOR INDICATORS
Table 9 provides a “snapshot” of the types of indicators to be used for monitoring NSP implementation. In order for this NSP document to remain dynamic, the actual indicator targets are provided in the NSP implementation matrixes (and the strategic plans of the RMI ministries and agencies). This allows each responsible implementing agency to update information in coordination with EPPSO. This also allows
EPPSO to work with real time indicators and targets during implementation of the NSP. The indicator snapshot provides insight regarding HOW the RMI plans to monitor NSP implementation and progress. The actual indicators in ministry and agency strategic plans, databases and implementation matrixes are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform so that real time information will be available.
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 10 provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with the Social Development Sector Over-Arching Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (1A-1E). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
National Development Themes
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure, and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
12. ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY SECTOR
The Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector is comprised of three strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Climate Change Policy or the Environmental Protection Authority Strategic Plan.
SECTOR DOCUMENTS AND PLANS
Strategic plans, national policies and other relevant documents related to the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector are listed in Table 11. These plans and policies are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform.
SECTOR OVERVIEW
Climate change and resiliency are two of the most important issues facing the RMI and other low lying atoll countries. At the 2013 Pacific Islands Forum, held in Majuro, the Majuro Declaration was agreed to by all delegations. As stated in the Forum Final Communiqué:
The Declaration is intended to highlight the Leaders’ strong political commitment to be the region of Climate Leaders, and is an effort to spark a new wave of climate leadership that accelerates the reduction and phasing down of greenhouse gas pollution worldwide.
The Forum Communiqué and the Majuro Declaration are located in Annex 6. Environment (General)
Since the start of The Compact as Amended, the RMI Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has received a small portion of these funds as part of the annual budget. The EPA directs a portion of annual budget to sanitation and water quality.
Overall the RMI EPA is responsible for providing the following services:
- Environmental health and water quality
- Land and coastal management
- Conservation planning
- Waste and pollution oversight
- Information management
- Planning and human resource management
- Education awareness and information
Risk Reduction, Climate Change and Environment
The low-lying atolls of the RMI are extremely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. As such, environmental sustainability is a vital forward looking issue for the Marshall Islands. At a special meeting of the UN Security Council in February 2013, the RMI Minister in Assistance delivered the following statement:
Climate change threatens lives, livelihoods, sovereign territory and, in some cases, the existence of states.” As a security issue, climate change is at the forefront of any discussion of long-term livelihood and sustainability for the islands. (SIDS Report 2013)
The National Climate Change Policy Framework (NCCPF) was adopted by the RMI government in 2011. This policy framework is designed to put forth the commitments of the RMI with regard to addressing climate change. As such, environment and climate change are priority issues for the RMI. The RMI continues to progress in this area with regard to the MDGs.
National Climate Change Framework
The institutional framework for the RMI focus on climate change is detailed in the RMI Climate Change Roadmap. The framework to support the development and implementation of the RMI National Climate Change Policy is built on the substantial existing configuration of sector approaches, while at the same time enhancing the coherence, coordination and effectiveness of national efforts. The overriding aim must be to “climate-proof” all development activities, including those under The Compact as Amended.
The RMI government considered a preliminary report prepared by the Office of the Chief Secretary, in January 2010, on the current capacity of the RMI to access and manages large-scale climate change
funds for climate adaptation and energy purposes. In approving the report, the RMI decided to establish a National Committee on Climate Change. The climate change policy of the RMI can be categorized broadly into four implementation clusters:
- Energy security and low-carbon future
- Adaptation for a climate-resilient future
- Disaster preparedness, risk reduction and response capacity
- Education, awareness, community mobilization, culture and gender
These four implementation clusters form the foundation for RMI climate change activities through the initial implementation period of this NSP.
Disaster Management and Response
The RMI has several documents focused on disaster management as noted in Table 11 however; the Joint National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management (JNAP) is the plan with the broadest outlook.
The JNAP, endorsed by Cabinet in March 2014, has seven goals that include outcomes, activities, outputs and indicators. The JNAP combines a focus on disaster management, an integrated approach to planning including mitigation of climate change issues, community resilience, energy security, emergency preparedness and education. The JNAP, added to the other climate change and disaster management documents detailed in Table 11, provides the RMI with a strong set of guidelines and plans to be called upon regarding disaster management.
Conservation Resource Management
Reimaanlok Looking to the Future: National Conservation Area Plan for the Marshall Islands 2007–2012 (Reimaanlok) was developed to fill the need for a conservation area planning framework. It is designed to "develop principles, process and guidelines for the design, establishment and management of conservation areas that are fully owned, led and endorsed by local communities based on their needs, values and cultural heritage."
This initiative has already been proven successful. The Namdrik Atoll Local Resources Committee, a nongovernmental organization, received global recognition for its outstanding efforts in sustainable development at the Rio +20 United Nation’s Conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 2012. As stated in the Reimaanlok facilitator guide:
Trends have strengthened the commitment within the Marshall Islands government and island communities to establish and manage community-based conservation areas of land and sea, while building upon other resource conservation strategies. The aim is to revive the physical and spiritual connection of people to their environment, to ensure the sustainable use of resources and food security, and to conserve the remarkable biodiversity of the Marshall Islands.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
Table 12 provides an overview of the development challenges for each strategic area in the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector. The identification of these challenges is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Development Challenges.
The development challenges provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHY the RMI government has prioritized specific Over-Arching Development Objectives in this sector.
Those development challenges in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Challenges for each strategic area. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Challenge is given further detail through Ministerial Development Challenges that directly relate to specific ministries and agencies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 13 provides an overview of the development objectives for each strategic area in the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector. The identification of these development objectives is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector Development Objectives.
The development objectives provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHAT issues the RMI government has prioritized in this sector.
Those development objectives in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Objectives for each strategic area and are numbered in sequence for the entire sector. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Objective is given further detail through Ministerial Development Objectives that directly relate to specific ministries and agency plans.
SECTOR INDICATORS
Table 14 provides a “snapshot” of the types of indicators to be used for monitoring NSP implementation. In order for this NSP document to remain dynamic, the actual indicator targets are provided in the NSP implementation matrixes (and the strategic plans of the RMI ministries and agencies). This allows each responsible implementing agency to update information in coordination with EPPSO. This also allows EPPSO to work with real time indicators and targets during implementation of the NSP. The indicator snapshot provides insight regarding HOW the RMI plans to monitor NSP implementation and progress.
The actual indicators in ministry and agency strategic plans, databases and implementation matrixes are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform so that real time information will be available.
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AN RESILIENCY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 15 provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with the Environment, Climate Change and Resiliency Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (2A-2C). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
National Development Themes
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure, and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
13. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Infrastructure Development Sector is comprised of five strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the National Energy Policy or the Ministry of Transportation and Communication Strategic Plan.
SECTOR DOCUMENTS AND PLANS
Strategic plans, national policies and other relevant documents related to the Infrastructure Development Sector are listed in Table 16. These plans and policies are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform.
SECTOR OVERVIEW
Transport (Air)
Domestic air transportation is provided by Air Marshall Islands (AMI). Over the past several years, AMI has continued operations only with continued subsidies from the RMI government. AMI is in the initial phase of redesigning their approach to business operations. Air service to the outer islands is critical for residents of those atolls with regards to the entire range of social, economic and other issues. Reliable air transportation is also vital to the development of tourism in the RMI. AMI no longer plans to rely on government subsidies. The business plan (draft) states:
We will operate the airline commercially and finance our entire operation from internally generated resources and loans based on our capacity to borrow. We are determined to maximize revenue and at the same time keep a tight rein on expenses. We will generate sufficient cash reserves to cover maintenance expenses when due.
The RMI government acknowledges that viable domestic air transportation, including outer island runway repair and maintenance, is crucial to tourism and economic growth.
The RMI people are also impacted by the fact that the RMI is regularly serviced by only one international airline. This is a concern regarding prices and schedules. International airline access influences tourism, costs of goods and services and social development issues including off island health referrals. Recently an arrangement for a second international airline to service Majuro (from the Southern Hemisphere) was concluded. The early impacts of this service are viewed as positive.
Transport (Water)
Reliable water transportation is critical to the RMI due to the great distances among the atolls. The Marshall Island Shipping Corporation (MISC) provides the majority of shipping service among the atolls, especially those at greater distances from the urban centers. The MISC detailed these priorities in the MISC Strategic Plan:
- Vessel fleet availability and planning
- Outer islands shipping services: structure and frequency
- Onshore infrastructure requirements
- Tariff schedule and review frequency
- Community service obligation: approach and level
- New markets: tourists, charter
- Asset management: focus on maintenance sustainability
- Organization structure
- Human resource management and staff capacity development
- Financial management and viability: performance, policies, practice and compliance
The critical nature of reliable inter-island water transportation continues to be an issue that the RMI will address throughout the implementation of the NSP. Building and repair of wharfs and docks in the outer islands is crucial to the economic growth of the RMI and to the socio-economic well being of the RMI citizens living in the outer islands.
Energy
RMI Energy reform and planning is guided by four primary documents:
- RMI National Energy Policy
- General Guide to Petroleum Sector Reform
- Marshalls Energy Company (MEC) Comprehensive Recovery Plan
- Kwajalein Atoll Joint Utility Resources (KAJUR) Comprehensive Reform Strategy
The RMI National Energy Policy was revised in June 2012. This policy focuses on improvements in energy efficiency and a gradual shift from reliance on oil to practical and affordable renewable energy sources. This effort is also part of the RMI strategy to build resilience to climate change.
The Petroleum Sector Reform Guide provides direction regarding key processes for raising the petroleum business standards, currently being used in the RMI, to those accepted globally and within the region.
Both the MEC Comprehensive Recovery Plan and the KAJUR Comprehensive Reform Strategy focus on improving and streamlining operations. Both documents also outline strategies on how to best move forward to provide both effective and efficient utility services to customers.
Water and Sanitation
The RMI National Water and Sanitation Policy states the following as the policy scope:
- The National Water and Sanitation Policy shall provide broad guidelines and support the state organ, including its central and local governments, in the formulation of water and sanitation laws, guidelines, strategies, investment plans, programs and projects
- Provide guidance and define rules and responsibilities for water and sanitation investment and activities for all sector stakeholders
- Provide a framework for the management of freshwater resources, water supply, safe disposal of excreta and wastewater; and the promotion of hygienic behaviors
- Cover all people, organizations and areas throughout RMI.
The Majuro Water and Sewer Company (MWSC) has identified a series of priority areas which represent targets for attention and, in some cases, urgent response regarding water and sanitation. While efforts continue to focus on understanding the nature of future climate variability, it is clear that the RMI faces major impacts on human health and water security with regard to community livelihoods and infrastructure security as a result of sea-level rise.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
The RMI’s National Waste Management Strategy (NWMS) was developed by a wide range of stakeholders to help provide vision, guidance and a coordinated, “living” process for solid waste management improvements in the RMI. The Majuro Atoll Waste Company (MAWC) oversees the NWMS. The overall goal of the NWMS is to develop, implement, and maintain a system of solid waste management in the RMI which is appropriate to conditions, and minimizes the negative impacts of poor waste management on both the health of people and the environment. On small atolls this is sometimes easier said than done.
The NWMS focuses on all types of solid waste including: residential, commercial, institutional and industrial sources and medical waste from the hospitals and dispensaries. It also covers scrap metal, used oil, used lead acid batteries, and e-waste.
With regard to hazardous waste, EPA is mandated to administer and enforce the Ozone Layer Protection Regulations (2004) and the Pesticides and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulations (2004). EPA is also responsible for monitoring and enforcing regulations regarding sewage and sewer facilities.
Information Communication Technology
The Ministry of Transportation and Communication (T&C) provides regulatory oversight and harmonization of telecommunications services in the RMI. The ministry is also responsible for implementing the National Information Communication Technology (ICT) Policy. This oversight includes spectrum management and enforcement of standards and licensing. The five guiding principles underpinning the policy objectives are:
- Open and competitive markets
- Modern, independent and proportionate regulation
- Non-discrimination and technology neutrality
- Universal service for remote areas of the RMI
- Optimal use of scarce resources
Furthermore, the medium term goals of policy for 2013–14 are:
- Establish the Office of the Regulator
- Strengthen and reform NTA in order to prepare the company to operate efficiently in a competitive market (which may include sale of all or part of the government’s shareholding)
- Promote new entry in the RMI market, particularly mobile and ISP services, and issue licenses to all operators including NTA
- Promote ICT access for schools, reducing the digital divide
- Design and implement mechanisms to significantly improve ICT services for outer islands
The National Telecommunications Authority (NTA) is the provider of telephone and internet services throughout the RMI. The NTA also provides a subscription television service. The NTA is currently working with the RMI government on revisions to a telecommunications bill regarding the liberalizing of telecommunications services. The NTA has the stated purpose to “provide connectivity to all Marshallese people at all times at the most cost efficient rate.” Through 2010 NTA paid dividends to shareholders. Since that time NTA has been unable to pay dividends as the organization struggles to balance accounts receivable with costs due to several factors including loan repayments.
NTA is currently in the process of developing a Corporate Plan, and is also actively working with the government on the issue of market liberalization.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
Table 17 provides an overview of the development challenges for each strategic area in the Infrastructure Development Sector. The identification of these challenges is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Infrastructure Development Sector Challenges.
The development challenges provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHY the RMI government has prioritized specific Over-Arching Development Objectives in this sector.
Those development challenges in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Challenges for each strategic area. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Challenge is given further detail through Ministerial Development Challenges that directly relate to specific ministries and agencies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 18 provides an overview of the development objectives for each strategic area in the Infrastructure Development Sector. The identification of these development objectives is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the Infrastructure Development Sector Development Objectives.
The development objectives provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHAT issues the RMI government has prioritized in this sector.
Those development objectives in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Objectives for each strategic area and are numbered in sequence for the entire sector. In many cases the Over-Arching
Development Objective is given further detail through Ministerial Development Objectives that directly relate to specific ministries and agency plans.
SECTOR INDICATORS
Table 19 provides a “snapshot” of the types of indicators to be used for monitoring NSP implementation. In order for this NSP document to remain dynamic, the actual indicator targets are provided in the NSP implementation matrixes (and the strategic plans of the RMI ministries and agencies). This allows each responsible implementing agency to update information in coordination with EPPSO. This also allows EPPSO to work with real time indicators and targets during implementation of the NSP. The indicator snapshot provides insight regarding HOW the RMI plans to monitor NSP implementation and progress.
The actual indicators in ministry and agency strategic plans, databases and implementation matrixes are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform so that real time information will be available.
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 20 provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Infrastructure Development Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (3A-3E). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
National Development Themes
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure, and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
14. SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTOR
The Sustainable Economic Sector is comprised of six strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the RMI National Trade Policy or the Ministry of Resources and Development Strategic Plan.
SECTOR DOCUMENTS AND PLANS
Strategic plans, national policies and other relevant documents related to the Sustainable Economic Development Sector are listed in Table 21. These plans and policies are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform.
SECTOR OVERVIEW
Agriculture and Agriculture Production
Moving forward agriculture and agriculture production in the RMI will be closely linked to the National Food Security Policy (Draft October 2013). The draft policy provides the four “dimensions” of food security for the RMI:
1. Availability: Sufficient quantities of appropriate quality food, through domestic production or imports
2. Access: Of individuals to adequate resources for acquiring appropriate food for a healthy diet
3. Use: Through adequate diet, clean water, sanitation and health care to reach a state of national well being.
4. Stability: The ability to maintain the above three factors during sudden shocks or cyclical events
Food security is an issue that cuts across several NSP strategic areas including marine resources/fisheries, transportation and trade. Agriculture and agriculture production, however, continue to be a foundation of food security in the RMI. As the draft policy states:
A thriving coconut industry remains vital for rural livelihoods, the economy and food security in RMI, particularly in the outer-islands where few other economic opportunities avail.
Marine Resources (Fisheries)
The draft policy also provides analysis regarding marine resources in the RMI and the importance to food security. The following is a statement from the draft policy:
Marine resources have significant economic importance, partly through income derived from fishing licenses, and partly through the employment and income generation from the tuna processing operations, from fishing activities and from servicing fishing vessels. Over the last decade the RMI has witnessed significant increases in fisheries contribution to GDP and in fisheries exports…
The Marshall Islands Marine Resources Authority (MIMRA) is the principal entity supporting fisheries and marine resources management. As per the MIMRA mission statement:
MIMRA will support legitimate, responsible private sector enterprise as the primary vehicle for commercial fisheries development through sound policies and legislation. MIMRA will facilitate and play an advisory role for the overall development of the nation’s fisheries with a view towards initiating and maintaining responsible, sustainable fisheries development.
One challenge facing the RMI and MIMRA is the development of a fisheries infrastructure that will further promote private sector (including local level) fisheries and trade opportunities.
Marine Resources (Deep Sea Mining)
Currently the RMI does not have a Deep Sea Mining (DSM) policy however the government realizes the potential opportunity in this sector and has taken steps towards developing a framework for moving forward.
The RMI is a participant in the regional SPC-EU EDF10 Deep Sea Minerals Project which is being implemented in the fifteen Pacific ACP States. As per the June 2012 (six month) progress report, the RMI was expected to focus on four activities:
1. Formalize the establishment of the Coastal Management Advisory Council (CMAC) as an operating arm of government to be responsible for specific coastal and marine issues including DSM activities (in progress as of 2013)
2. Develop an RMI DSM policy
3. Review the MIMRA Act to cover DSM activities
4. Build in-country capacity in relevant aspects of DSM to enable RMI to fully participate in this new industry.
The Ministry of R&D is currently the lead agency with regard to DSM issues and activities.
Trade and Local Manufacturing
The RMI National Trade Policy is managed by the Trade and Investment Division of the Ministry of R&D. This policy focuses on trade and development of local manufacturing. The primary objective of the National Trade Policy:
…To promote export-led sustainable economic growth and self-reliance with the ultimate objective of creating employment, alleviating hardship and raising the living standards of RMI citizens.
The RMI National Trade Policy also seeks to assist with identifying production constraints in several economic sectors including agriculture, fisheries, tourism, manufacturing and handicrafts. The long-term focus of the policy is “value addition, diversification of the export basket, addressing product standards, consolidation of the existing markets, finding new markets and assisting exporters to access these markets.”
This policy is designed to identify trade priorities and focus attention on addressing the supply-side constraints that inhibit the production of goods and services that have export potential.
Tourism
The Marshall Islands Visitors Authority (MIVA) is the central organization with regard to tourism and tourism development. The MIVA National Tourism Plan provides this objective:
To develop our economic base through tourism and to enable all Marshallese to benefit from controlled tourism development, insisting that this development will complement the Marshallese people, their natural environment and cultural heritage.
Tourism in the RMI is impeded by limited international air transportation and unreliable domestic air transportation. With this in mind the MIVA tourism plan noted that it is important in the medium and longer term for the RMI to focus on:
The development of quality, general interest, beach oriented tourism while at the same time maintaining a high profile within the specialist interest niche markets. An overarching longer term focus is to encourage and emphasize the development of high yield quality tourism rather than high volume tourism.
This is supported by two broad development objectives
- Tourism development in the RMI will be private sector driven
- Cultural and environmental sustainability. Tourism must not infringe on the Marshallese culture, but should support and promote the culture
MIVA coordinates with the government ministries/agencies, private sector businesses, RMI Chamber of Commerce and NGO groups to promote and further develop tourism in the RMI.
Financial Services, Private Sector Investment, Employment
The RMI Small Business Development Center (RMI SBDC) is a member of the University of Guam’s Pacific Islands Development Center Network (PISBDCN). The PISBDCN’s mission is to support the growth and economic development of the U.S. affiliated islands in the Western Pacific region by providing high quality training and one-on-one confidential counseling to existing small businesses and to small business start-ups. The RMI SBDC will continue this work through the implementation of RMI SBDC Strategic Plan. This plan is currently operational through 2015.
The Chamber of Commerce Strategic Plan, drafted in 2013, recognizes that the primary function of the Marshall Islands Chamber of Commerce (CoC) is to be the voice of business, whether at the local, regional national level, or sector level. The CoC also plays an important service role, providing member companies with advice, information and knowledge with regards to the business environment.
The CoC Executive Board expressed a high level of desire during stakeholder consultations (and has in the past in other venues) to work and coordinate with the government regarding private sector development, and more specifically job creation, as a top priority of both government and the private sector.
Government Investment
The RMI Trust Fund is the vehicle that the RMI uses for investment as per The Compact as Amended. The Trust Fund is designed to replace compact grant funding contributions to the annual RMI budget at the end of the grant funding in 2023. The government works with independent financial advisors regarding investment strategies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
Table 22 provides an overview of the development challenges for each strategic area in the Sustainable Economic Development Sector. The identification of these challenges is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Sustainable Economic Development Sector Challenges.
The development challenges provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHY the RMI government has prioritized specific Over-Arching Development Objectives in this sector.
Those development challenges in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Challenges for each strategic area. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Challenge is given further detail through Ministerial Development Challenges that directly relate to specific ministries and agencies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 23 provides an overview of the development objectives for each strategic area in the Sustainable Economic Development Sector. The identification of these development objectives is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the Sustainable Economic Development Sector Development Objectives.
The development objectives provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHAT issues the RMI government has prioritized in this sector.
Those development objectives in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Objectives for each strategic area and are numbered in sequence for the entire sector. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Objective is given further detail through Ministerial Development Objectives that directly relate to specific ministries and agency plans.
SECTOR INDICATORS
work with real time indicators and targets during implementation of the NSP. The indicator snapshot provides insight regarding HOW the RMI plans to monitor NSP implementation and progress.
The actual indicators in ministry and agency strategic plans, databases and implementation matrixes are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform so that real time information will be available.
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 25 provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Sustainable Economic Development Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (4A-4F). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macro-indicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
National Development Themes
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and values through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy, environmental, infrastructure, and transportation security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches and specifically the implementation of the Majuro Declaration.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy a high quality of life.
15. GOOD GOVERNANCE SECTOR
The Good Governance Sector is comprised of six strategic areas:
Each strategic area is coordinated with rolling strategic plans at the ministry/agency level and/or a national policy such as the Public Safety Strategic Plan or the draft Tax Reform Legislation.
SECTOR DOCUMENTS AND PLANS
Strategic plans, national policies and other relevant documents related to the Good Governance Sector are listed in Table 26. These plans and policies are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform.
SECTOR OVERVIEW
Public Administration
In the 2012 Annual Report to Cabinet, the Public Service Commission (PSC) outlined the priority of promoting the principles and practices of good governance. This report further noted the challenges facing the PSC in maintaining and promoting Public Service efficiency and effectiveness. The PSC is in the process of developing a strategic plan to address the challenges facing the organization. This plan is organized around three planning themes (and corresponding strategic issues):
Planning Theme 1: Adding value to the RMI PSC
- Strategic Issue: How will the PSC develop the RMI Strategic Public Service Workforce Plan?
- Strategic Issue: How should the PSC conduct a review of the public service job classifications and remuneration to ensure fair and equal pay for equal work?
- Strategic Issue: What national initiatives does the PSC need to strategically link to and what role should the PSC play?
Planning Theme 2: Adding Value to the Public Service Commission
- Strategic Issue: How does the PSC need to change to be able to assist government ministries and agencies in all areas of human resource management and development?
- Strategic Issue: How can the PSC establish a Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS) that will improve Human Resource Management (HRM) decision making and administration?
Planning Theme 3: Adding Value to the Public Service Commission Programs and Processes
- Strategic Issue: How can the PSC improve current personnel administration processes to provide consistently efficient, effective and accurate services to all public servants?
- Strategic Issue: Can the regulations that govern the public service be improved? How can understanding and commitment to public service rules and regulations be increased?
- Strategic Issue: How can government assistance to SOEs and other public sector agencies in personnel administration and HRM be improved?
For each strategic issue PSC has developed a methodology, approach and identified outputs. This information is located in the PSC Strategic Plan.
Public Financial Management
Balanced Budget
In order to address the issue of balancing priorities within the budget in the face of declining funding from The Compact, as Amended, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) is using the Financial Management Model (FMM). The FMM, in coordination with the Medium Term Budget and Investment Framework (MTBIF) is a financial tool designed to assist the RMI in calculating annual budgets and projecting revenues and budgets over the medium term. This model was introduced to the MOF by the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Tax Reform
Regarding changes to tax legislation, the RMI has introduced the following tax bills in the Nitijela:
- Bill 2012/11: Consumption Tax Act
- Bill 2012/12: Import Duty Amendment Act
- Bill 2012/13: Revenue Administration Act
- Bill 2012/14: Revenue Authority Act
- Bill 2102/15: Excise Tax Act
- Bill 2012/16: Net Profit Tax Act
- Income Tax (Wages and Salaries) Amendment Act, 2014
Specific recommendations included in this legislation:
- Wages and salaries tax rate changes
- Dividend and interest withholding tax changes
- Business income tax changes
- Replace import duties and local sales taxes with consumption tax and excise tax
- New tax authority
- New Revenue Administration Act
Over the past two years, there have been public hearings on three of the proposed tax bills, with public hearings planned for the remaining bills in the August 2014 session of the Nitijela. To date, there has been no concrete position on the enactment of the proposed changes to the RMI tax regime although the authorities continue to engage the public in education and promotion of the tax bills.
Law Justice and Public Safety
Public Safety
The RMI National Police Force is organized under the Ministry of Justice. The Department of Public Safety (DPS), in the most recent strategic plan, outlines what the DPS believes is necessary to provide high quality law and order, security services and socio-economic development of the RMI including:
- Work as a team within and across the police force
- Work in close consultation with the community and its representatives of women, youth, church and business groups
- Work in partnership with stakeholders such as customs, health, education and immigration to detect crime, in enforcing the nation’s laws, and to deter and prevent such unlawful activity by identifying and addressing the underlying causes
Furthermore the DPS further outlines how it will continue to work in partnership with regional and other international police forces to ensure security of the nation by:
- Improving specialist policing skills and related capability
- Identifying and implementing “best practice” to apply continuous improvement in the quality delivery of professional law, order and security services
- Sharing intelligence to detect and deter trans-national crime
Courts
The RMI maintains both a traditional court system and a Western court system. The Courts are responsible for overseeing cases at all levels (criminal, civil, probate traditional rights, High Court and Supreme Court). A summary of the responsibilities of each court is as follows:
Supreme Court
• Appeals heard from High Court (Supreme Court)
High Court and Probate Court
- Determine disputes and arrive at appropriate damage awards (civil)
- Resolve deceased estates and appoint administrators (probate)
- Appeals heard from District Court (High Court)
- Determine petitions for adoption, child support and guardianship
District Court (3 courts)
- Appropriate judgment of guilt/innocence, fitting sentence (criminal, juvenile, traffic)
- Determine disputes and arrive at appropriate damage awards (civil/small claims)
- Appeals heard from Community Courts
Community Court (30 courts)
- Appropriate judgment of guilt/innocence, fitting sentence (criminal) in Outer Islands
- Determine disputes and arrive at appropriate damage awards (civil/small claims) in Outer Islands
- Judgments and decisions rendered in matters of customary law and traditional practice
Traditional Rights Court (3 courts)
- Determine matters of customary law and traditional practice as referred by the High Court
- Conduct hearings at the request of the High Court
- Provide opinions to the High Court
Also at the High Court and District Court level marriages are performed under the “Birth Death and Marriage Act”, and decisions are rendered on marriage, divorce, child support, legal and customary adoption and guardianship.
There is also an Office of the Public Defender to provide legal services for those who cannot afford such services.
Legal and Regulatory
The RMI legal and regulatory framework currently in place can be strengthened through the establishment and implementation of institutional capacity development programs at core agencies across all sectors. Capacity building at the infrastructure sector can target implementation of national policies for water, sewer, energy, and solid and hazardous waste. Economic development capacity building in the strategic areas of food security and trade are critical. Most importantly, institutional capacity building in the environment sector with a focus on climate change, disaster management and conservation efforts (national and local) are at the forefront of the challenge of institutional and capacity building regarding this framework.
SOE Management and Reform
The RMI continues to address State Owned Enterprise (SOE) Reform. Proposed legislation states that each SOE has the following objectives (Section10 of SOE Legislation)
- To be a successful business, and to this end, to be at least as profitable and efficient as comparable businesses
- To maximize the net worth of the public investment in the State Owned Enterprise
The SOE legislation seeks to address the requirement for the commercial focus of SOE board management to be balanced with the provision for the government to have appropriate influence as shareholders. Additionally, the issue of developing performance measures and objectives against which the board will be held accountable is to be addressed.
Fiscal and Macroeconomic Planning
In order to ensure that the FMM and the MTBIF are effective, it is crucial that the RMI government continues to implement a three-year rolling strategic planning process aligned with annual PBB process and the NSP. This ensures ministries and agencies are aware of how to align financial ceilings with ongoing and annual priorities that are included in ministry/agency strategic plans and the NSP.
PBB is a performance management tool that improves accountability of managers and personnel by emphasizing performance. PBB promotes transparency by providing clear and direct linkages between priorities, available funding, implementation and results. PBB provides information necessary for government mangers and leaders to map expenditure to performance. The information will allow for the monitoring of performance against funding for each ministry/agency.
The goal of PBB is to improve fiscal and macro planning. PBB asks managers to estimate costs (inputs/spending) associated with each task prior to receiving the universal budget. By calculating proposed costs prior to receiving the budget call, the government has the ability to budget more effectively, freeing up funding for priority areas. PBB also emphasizes that ministries/agencies must prioritize activities and outputs in alignment with their individual plans and also with the NSP.
PBB aligned with strategic planning recognizes that each ministry/agency must be accountable for the efficient use of funds. The PBB efforts are central to increasing the accountability of fiscal and macro-economic planning in the RMI as well as addressing the critical function of measuring performance against expenditure with regard to NSP development objectives.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
Table 27 provides an overview of the development challenges for each strategic area in the Good Governance Sector. The identification of these challenges is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the RMI Good Governance Sector Challenges.
The development challenges provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHY the RMI government has prioritized specific Over-Arching Development Objectives in this sector.
Those development challenges in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Challenges for each strategic area. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Challenge is given further detail through Ministerial Development Challenges that directly relate to specific ministries and agencies.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 28 provides an overview of the development objectives for each strategic area in the Good Governance Sector. The identification of these development objectives is the result of a review of current national policies, ministry plans, policy documents, legislation and other relevant documents. Input from stakeholders was also critical in identifying the Good Governance Sector Development Objectives.
The development objectives provide the initial “roadmap” regarding WHAT issues the RMI government has prioritized in this sector.
Those development objectives in bold are considered to be the Over-Arching Development Objectives for each strategic area and are numbered in sequence for the entire sector. In many cases the Over-Arching Development Objective is given further detail through Ministerial Development Objectives that directly relate to specific ministries and agency plans.
SECTOR INDICATORS
work with real time indicators and targets during implementation of the NSP. The indicator snapshot provides insight regarding HOW the RMI plans to monitor NSP implementation and progress.
The actual indicators in ministry and agency strategic plans, databases and implementation matrixes are also available through hyper-links in the NSP electronic platform so that real time information will be available.
NSP NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND GOOD GOVERNANCE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Table 30 provides the synthesis of NSP National Development Themes with The Good Governance Sector Development Objectives identified for each strategic area (5A-5F). This table illustrates the association of each Over-Arching Development Objective aligns with the ten National Development Themes. This correlation serves as a macroindicator regarding NSP alignment with RMI national priorities.
National Priority Themes
1. Ensuring and applying the practice of good governance principles to achieve effective governance through community planning and developing effective linkages between local and national government.
2. Empowering people and communities to reduce the incidence of “access related” poverty through improvements in all areas including social, economic environment, governance and infrastructure.
3. Strengthening ability to mobilize local and traditional knowledge to address emerging challenges facing people, communities and governments.
4. Building up a caring society embodied by traditional culture and value through continued focus on cultural awareness and cultural responsibility.
5. Promoting an innovative people by improving health and education access and opportunities.
6. Addressing globalization and regional cooperation challenges through focused legislations, international agreements and implementation of regional and national policies.
7. Ensuring broad-based growth and food security through a cross-cutting approach.
8. Building a sound infrastructure that provides energy and environmental security for all atolls.
9. Mitigating the impacts of climate change and creating awareness of the importance of environmental assets through community, national, regional and international approaches.
10. Ensuring outer islands populations receive access to all necessary services allowing all RMI citizens to enjoy high quality of life.
16. HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Human resource capacity development is identified throughout the RMI government as a cross cutting issue for all ministries and agencies. For this reason this issue is detailed in a standalone section.
The Public Service Commission (PSC) and the National Training Council (NTC) are currently working on several facets of Human Resource Development (HRD) for the RMI public service and for the general population of the RMI. PSC is focusing on the following:
- Public Service Commission Workforce Plan
- RMI Public Service Strategic Development Plan
- Human Resource Information Management System (HRMIS)
- Human Resource Management (HRM) System Framework Development
- Human Resource Development (HRD) System Framework Development
- Remuneration and Classification System Reform
- Expansion of PSC roles and functions in championing Good Governance Principles
- Strategically redesigning/re-structuring of PSC
NTC is continuing work on the National HRD Plan. Ongoing stakeholder workshops are being conducted in order to continue the validation of the National HRD Plan. There is also a National Steering Committee in place to guide the development of this National HRD plan.
The NSP is designed to coordinate with the ongoing PSC HR reform initiatives. The NSP electronic platform will include hyper-links that will link stakeholders to all ongoing work in HRD for both the PSC and NTC.
17. NSP IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
NSP Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (M&E) Overview
EPPSO is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the NSP. The NSP is designed to be web-based and housed at EPPSO. The web-based NSP provides for a dynamic document that can be updated on a regular basis. Real time monitoring will be conducted using the NSP electronic platform.
EPPSO serves as the gatekeeper for updating progress of the NSP and updating links to all relevant information. Ministries and agencies will provide EPPSO with updates so that the NSP electronic platform reflects “real time” information. This NSP electronic platform is to be accessible to all stakeholders for review and for information. In addition to providing the necessary platform to conduct M&E in real time, the electronic platform also:
- Provides, for the first time, a “one-stop shop” for all RMI and international stakeholders to find real time information regarding government planning, budgeting, legislation, and international commitments
- Provides access, in real time, for Ministers and other government officials to review ongoing progress with regard to implementing the NSP and related plans, budgets and policies.
- Underscores that it is imperative that all government plans and policies are updated so that the most up to date information is available.
- Emphasizes the critical role of EPPSO pertaining to planning and with regard to monitoring NSP implementation and progress.
The NSP electronic platform includes hyper-links to ministry/agency strategic plans, national policy documents, RMI international and regional agreements and other relevant information such as the 2011 RMI Census. This platform also includes links to an additional range of information including links to other RMI websites. With this menu the NSP electronic platform provides government, donors and other interested parties with information, in real time, not only of NSP progress, but also of ongoing progress in other areas of government.
The electronic platform also provides links to the NSP implementation matrixes. These implementation matrixes will be used by EPPSO, and government leaders, to monitor and evaluate progress regarding NSP implementation. EPPSO will also use these matrixes to prepare an annual progress report. An example of the NSP implementation matrixes is located in Annex 1.
The implementation matrixes are coordinated with ministry/agency strategic plans and budgets. This provides for a two-tiered M&E framework. The NSP implementation matrixes provide the initial level of monitoring (National/Tier 1). The matrixes include the following information regarding the Over-Arching Development Objectives:
• NSP over-arching development objective
• NSP ministerial objectives
• Issues to address (development challenges)
• Medium term strategies
• Medium term outcomes
• Medium term indicators and targets (developed by implementing agencies and EPPSO)
• Budget information
• Links to relevant planning and policy documents
Additionally, hyper-links to individual strategic plans in each RMI ministry/agency provide the secondary level of M&E (Ministerial/Tier 2), providing a further drill down of details regarding implementation and progress of the Ministerial Development Objectives including:
• Implementing activities (specific activities linked to medium term strategies)
• Short term outcomes/milestones (specifically lined to medium term outcomes)
• Short term indicators(where possible to monitor changes in shorter terms)
• Responsible divisions (and positions)
• Coordination responsibilities (external and internal of ministry/agency, other stakeholders)
• Specific funding amounts and sources of funding
• Timeframes
This two tiered M&E framework provides the RMI government and all stakeholders the opportunity to see both a broad view (medium term) of progress, and also a more targeted view (short term/annual).
EPPSO will prepare an annual NSP progress report. This report will provide a status update for each sector and also will include an update regarding the NSP status vis-à-vis selected core indicators located in Annex 8. Reporting on specific data in the areas of health, education and environment is currently provided by relevant ministries on a quarterly basis, this is expected to continue.
Monitoring Methodology
With the NSP designed as a dynamic document, the M&E methodology is fundamentally formative in nature. A formative methodology allows for assessment of ongoing actions including how strategies are implemented (process), objectives are achieved (outcomes), and results (impacts) are delivered. Formative M&E has the goal of providing information illustrating progress and updates on an annual basis (at a minimum). This approach can provide for more frequent reporting when requested by the government.
This M&E approach also provides for the assessment of ongoing processes allowing the government to suggest improvements to ongoing implementation plans with the aim of continuous improvement. This is the opposite of the summative monitoring approach that evaluates AFTER strategies have been implemented. The formative approach looks to identify and review ongoing processes with the aim of ensuring delivery of outcomes and expected results.
Levels of Monitoring
The formative M&E approach provides three levels of analysis:
- Process level
- Outcome level
- Impact level
Process Monitoring
Monitoring for continuous improvement is important to the realization of the positive implementation of the NSP. Process monitoring focusing on improvement will supply the following type of information:
- Are the implementation processes affecting expected results? How? Why?
- Are/were the right people involved? If not who is/was missing?
- Are there modifications needed? How do the modifications affect the process?
- How do the modifications affect the expected outcomes/results? Are timelines being met?
Outcome Monitoring
Outcome monitoring focuses on whether or not NSP development objectives are being met. NSP outcome monitoring will review the following type of information:
- Are NSP development objectives (outcomes) being met?
- Are there specific development objectives that are more efficient in realizing outcomes?
- Are development objectives aligned for results in both the short and medium term?
Impact Monitoring
Impact monitoring evaluates the impact of the NSP. Impact monitoring provides the following information:
- What has been the impact of the NSP in both the short and medium terms?
- How has the NSP impacted ongoing RMI government planning and budgeting?
- How have the stakeholders been affected? What are the pluses and minuses of impacts on stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups?
In order to ensure successful implementation of the NSP, EPPSO will provide the following:
- Continued capacity development regarding planning and information collection at ministries/agencies
- M&E capacity development at Ministries and EPPSO
- Implementation of an NSP media plan for public awareness. This will be disseminated on the NSP electronic platform as well as print and radio media
- Semi-annual NSP stakeholder consultations
Summary of NSP Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
In summary, the M&E framework is focused on providing consistent and reliable updates and reporting as well as providing “real time” information. The principal areas of the monitoring framework are:
- EPPSO serves as NSP gatekeeper (electronic platform), provides planning and M&E capacity development
• Two-tiered monitoring
- Over-Arching Development Objectives
- Ministerial Development Objectives
Formative M&E framework NSP annual report to government NSP media plan Stakeholder consultations ANNEX 1 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX (EXAMPLE)
SOCIAL SECTOR/STRATEGIC AREA : EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX (MOE)
SOCIAL SECTOR/STRATEGIC AREA : EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX (MOE)
SOCIAL SECTOR/STRATEGIC AREA : EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX (MOE)
SOCIAL SECTOR/STRATEGIC AREA : EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX (MOE)
ANNEX 2 RMI NATIONAL PLANNING HISTORY
RMI NATIONAL PLANNING HISTORY TIMELINE
The timeline of major planning efforts in the history of the RMI since 1991 (Second 5 Year-Plan):
Second Five-Year (1991–96): Focus on increasing real incomes, employment opportunities, equitable development and promoting national identity and unity.
The National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS): Developed in 2000 to integrate the Barbados Plan of Action into the national development process. The NSDS offered a range of recommendations regarding government planning and sustainable development at the national level. The NSDS also made specific recommendations, including recommendations in the area of climate change and sea level rise (See The Barbados Plan of Action 14 Priority Areas).
UN Millennium Development Declaration (2000): In 2000, the RMI became a party to the United Nations Millennium Declaration. By ratifying the declaration, the RMI government pledged to its citizens (and the world) to pursue a number of development goals and targets. The MDGs include 8 goals and 21 targets together with 48 performance assessment indicators. In January 2009, the RMI MDG Working Group was established to follow up on RMI progress.
METO2000 (ADB 2001): A strategic planning document that included national goals, strategies, planning schedules and budget.
RMI Vision 2018 Master-plan (2001): The Vision 2018 document is a strategic planning framework which provides the RMI with a 15 year planning perspective (2003–2018). The Vision 2018 Declaration to the Marshallese was considered when developing the NSP Vision. Vision 2018 was the result of extensive consultations during the second National Economic and Social Summit (NESS).
Introduction of Performance Based Budgeting (PBB) (2003): PBB was initially designed for implementation in ministries receiving funds from The Compact as Amended. It has expanded to additional government ministries and SOE’s since that time. The PBB is used to manage the day to day operations of a ministry. It improves short and medium term planning so that necessary outcomes and activities can be implemented. PBB improves monitoring and evaluation of performance, resulting in increased ministry and government wide accountability. PBB also informs and explains requests for funds through the Budget Appropriation Bill(s). PBB provides information, explanation and justification to enable the Nitijela to understand the purpose of each activity in that a ministry is undertaking.
Introduction of Rolling Strategic Planning (2004): Capacity building efforts, in conjunction with the implementation of PBB, focused on assisting all ministries and agencies implementing PBB to develop and maintain three-year rolling strategic plans. The plans are updated on an annual basis, concurrent with updating the annual budget. This allows the ministry to take into consideration not just the progress made during the past year, but future goals and objectives when developing the annual budget and updating the strategic plans.
The Mauritius Declaration (2005): The Mauritius Strategies for Sustainable Development focused on 19 areas that are important to Small Island Developing States (SIDS).
ADB Pacific Studies Series (2005): Analysis and presentation of the way forward in six broad-based socioeconomic areas:
- Social and Economic Update
- Role of the Public Sector and Reform
- Population
- Environment
- Basic Services-Education and Health
- Private Sector Development
The report evaluated the progress and achievements in reference to Meto2000, which identified six major goals and underpinned 24 strategies. The summary findings and/or observations revealed that 10 of the 24 strategies had no progress, 12 had some progress, and 2 had made strong progress.
RMI MDG Progress Report (2009): This report reviewed RMI progress in reaching the MDG’s by 2015 target date. It provided an overview and analysis for each goal and target from the RMI perspective, while providing thoughts as to whether or not the RMI would meet the goals. With the exception of Goal 6, it was reported that the RMI was making mixed progress or would likely meet each of the goals.
RMI National SIDS Report (2013): This report was developed in preparation for the 2014 SIDS Conference. The report describes progress to date regarding the implementation of Vision 2018, The Barbados Plan of Action, and Mauritius Strategy of Implementation (MSI), as grouped under the four pillars of the post-2015 discussions on sustainable development. The report also included analysis on renewed political commitment, new and emerging challenges and priorities for sustainable development.
ANNEX 3 DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
ANNEX 4 REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF VISION 2018
VISION 2018 REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF GOALS
The Strategic Development Plan Framework 2003–2018, Vision 2018, is the most comprehensive national planning document in the RMI. Vision 2018 provides the foundation for moving forward with national goals and objectives in this current NSP. An assessment of the progress made with regard to the Vision 2018 goals sets the stage for moving forward with current national goals and objectives. The Vision 2018 set forth ten goals.
Through a review and analysis of the Vision 2018 goals, the NSP way forward and national priorities were developed. A review of each Vision 2018 goal includes analysis of the current situation, with regard to the goal, and the consideration of national priorities moving forward. The Vision 2018 analysis follows:
Vision 2018 Goal 1- Operating in an interdependent world:
(i) Foreign Policy: Having the ability to design and implement our national sustainable development policies and programs in order to maximize national benefits and to foster our International relations, recognizing explicitly the current and future limits imposed and opportunities provided by our political and economic ties with the rest of the world, globalization, and technological advances.
(ii) Climate Change: Having adequately strengthened the institutional and procedural mechanism aimed at securing the maximum possible advantage of international and regional co-operation to minimize the adverse impact of Global Warming and Climate Change.
Analysis (i): RMI foreign policy continues to be successful in working with bi-lateral and multi-lateral donors. Continued focus on improving and expanding sustainable development policies through cooperation with donor partners and international and regional organizations is a continued priority. Analysis (ii): RMI has created the Office of Environmental Planning and Policy Coordination (OEPPC) and this office continues to be active on a global scale. In the past three years, the RMI has developed a Climate Change Policy Framework, a Climate Change Road Map and a Joint National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management (JNAP). Continued focus on the environment and more specifically climate change is a continued priority.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With the progress made with regard to Vision 2018, Objective one, continued focus on improving sustainable development through increased international dialogue is a priority. Furthermore, mitigating the impacts of climate change and climate related disasters is a priority moving forward, especially with current climate change mitigation and adaptation issues being brought to the forefront. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Sustainable International Dialogue
• Sustainable development (economic, political technological)
• Environmental Security
- Coastal security
- Land security
- Marine security
Vision 2018 Goal 2- Enhanced Socio-Economic Self Reliance:
(i) Macroeconomic Framework: Having achieved a level of quality development in our economy and society such that our dependence on foreign financial and technical assistance and skills as well as dependence of our private sector and household on government expenditures are reduced by helping ourselves first before we seek others help.
(ii) Partnership and Coordination: Achieving a state of productive and effective partnership among all important decision makers at all levels of the Marshall Islands Society.
(iii) Food Security: To attain food security for all people at all times and to substitute imports to the best extent possible and develop exports.
(iv) Infrastructure: Having developed a level of infrastructure services that is operated smoothly and maintained regularly, that adequately services the needs of sustainable development and enhancement of self-reliance with minimum adverse impact on the environment.
Analysis (i): The RMI continues to be dependent on foreign financial and technical assistance. Recently, the RMI has worked to develop financial policies (MTBIF) and legislation (tax) to improve the local economic base. The RMI Trust Fund is one vehicle that focuses on decreasing foreign financial dependence. The RMI is also implementing new policies focusing on improving the skills of the local workforce. Analysis (ii): The RMI continues to work to forge productive relationships among and across the various levels of government. Continued focus of the national government (MOIA, MOH, MOE and others) on outer island improvements and community development continue to provide a way for leaders to partner decision-making at all government levels. Tradition and culture continue to play a critical role in all decision-making. Continued emphasis on cultural responsibilities and identity has a significant impact on the effective partnership of decision makers across RMI society. Analysis (iii): RMI has recently drafted a Food Security Policy with the assistance of the Food and Agriculture Organization; it is expected to be presented to Nitijela in 2014 Analysis (iv): Infrastructure and maintenance issues continue to dominate a large portion of the national dialogue. Improvements in transportation throughout the RMI and other infrastructure issues on Majuro and Ebeye are issues that demand national attention.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issues as stated in Vision 2018, Objective two, a continued focus on economic security is of highest importance. As The Compact as Amended decrements are being applied, this issue is at the forefront of everyday discussion. Effective dialogue among all leaders throughout society is an issue that is continually addressed. Infrastructure, impacted by the need for available funding (economic security), is a priority as the RMI focuses on several crosscutting issues, including food security.
As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Economic and Financial Security
• Decrease dependence on foreign economic and technical assistance
• Private Sector Growth and Participation in Economic Development
• Rules and regulations encouraging expansion of private sector
• Favorable Investment Climate
• Rules and regulations encouraging foreign investment
• Growth of Trade as Integral to Economic Development
• Trade policy integrated into macro-economic dialogue
• Effective Decision Making Dialogue
- Communication across and among government leaders
- Cultural identity and traditional practice as an integral part of all decision making
• Food Security
• Focus on local food security issues and reducing imports
• Infrastructure Security and Maintenance
- Transportation infrastructure reliable
- Water, energy and ICT security (reliable services)
- Water, energy and ICT policies focus on national issues
Vision 2018 Goal 3- An Educated People:
(i) Establishing a knowledge-based economy by equipping Marshallese citizens with internationally competitive skills, qualifications and positive attitudes to work and society.
Analysis (i): The RMI continues to place a great deal of emphasis on education, with $16 million in The Compact as Amended funding being awarded to the MOE annually since 2003. The current MOE strategic plan places emphasis on improving student results, enrollment rates for all students, reducing dropout rates and developing the skills and standards of teachers and principals. The NTC continues to focus and expand programs for students in technical education areas and is now focusing on employment issues for those qualified technical-education students.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective three, a continued focus on high quality education is a national priority. The focus is not only on students, but on teachers and communities as well. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• High Quality Education Available
- Student results
- Teacher quality
- Community partnerships
Competitive and Skilled Workforce • Technical education programs providing workforce needs
Vision 2018 Goal 4- A Healthy People
(i) Build capacity of each community, family, and individual to care for their own health through quality primary health care program and to provide high quality, effective, affordable and efficient health services to Marshallese.
Analysis (i): The RMI continues to place a great deal of emphasis on health, with $6 million in The Compact as Amended funding being awarded to the MOH annually since 2003. The current MOH strategic plan places emphasis on several areas including addressing the issues surrounding lifestyle diseases and Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). Health care in the outer islands continues to be an area that MOH also focuses on. Improvements in hospital staffing and equipment are other areas of importance.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective four, a continued focus on quality health care services is a national priority. Recently, the Nitijela passed a Declaration regarding the need to address NCDs. Looking to the future, the RMI hopes to emphasize preventive rather than curative health care. In the medium term, this could be a difficult balance for available funds. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Secure High Quality Health Care
- Focus on NCDs
- Preventive health care
- Hospital services
- Outer island health care
Vision 2018 Goal 5- A Productive People
(i) Enabling Marshallese within their capacity and capability to develop a sense of purpose, take initiative, participate and contribute in the sustainable development of our nation.
Analysis (i): The RMI has continued to support community development programs over the past twelve years. Awareness campaigns regarding health, education, governance, energy and culture issues as well as other national priority issues have consistently been funded in ministry budgets, and by NGOs. Small business development and agriculture extension services are also provided by the RMI government. Opportunities to participate in traditional and cultural activities continue to increase. Policies on gender, children, youth and the disabled are either being developed or have been developed, offering all segments of Marshallese society, who might otherwise be left behind, the opportunities to contribute in a positive manner to the nation.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective five, emphasis on ensuring all Marshallese have the opportunity to participate to the positive development of the country continues to expand. Increased business and education opportunities, and focused policies and legislation, provide a larger segment of society the necessary tools to improve their own livelihoods and develop their own sense of purpose. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities can be summarized as follows:
• Sustainable Livelihoods for all Marshallese Society
- Vulnerable groups mainstreamed into society (women, children, youth, disabled)
- Small business opportunities for all atolls
- Agriculture extension in outer islands (coconut replanting)
Vision 2018 Goal 6- A Law Abiding People
(i) Establishing a just society in which the people are knowledgeable of traditional, national and international laws and uphold and respect the principles of good governance.
Analysis (i): The RMI has continued to rely on a comprehensive legal framework that supports both traditional and customary laws as well as Western law. Police are in place in the major urban centers (both national and local). Land issues are primarily resolved in the Traditional Court.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective six, emphasis on ensuring that all Marshallese are guaranteed legal rights in both the traditional and nontraditional courts continues to be a priority. Traditional courts will continue to be looked upon to resolve land issues and maintain the traditional and cultural fabric of society. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Impartial Legal System
- Speedy and impartial law enforcement
- Accountable and transparent Judiciary
• Traditional and Cultural Responsibility
- Traditional leaders continue to oversee traditional law
- Traditional courts continue resolve land issues
Vision 2018 Goal 7- A God Loving People
(i) Acknowledge spirituality of people and nurtures moral and ethical growth at all levels of society and at the same time respects the diversity of in the religious beliefs in every single citizen of the Marshall Islands.
Analysis (i): Religion and family values have always played a major role in Marshallese society. These values are reflected in the strong attachment the Marshallese have to the country, the land and all of the people. This has contributed to “nation building” and the strong national identity of the Marshallese.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective seven, emphasis on family spirituality values continues to be an integral part of everyday society. As such, this strong spiritual connection to the land and the people continues to play a critical role in development. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Maintain Traditional Family and Spiritual Values
- Build patriotism and national identity
- Respect religion and maintain peace and harmony in society
Vision 2018 Goal 8 – Respecting Individual Freedom and Fundamental Human Rights
(i) While safeguarding the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution, the Marshall Islands wishes to strike a balance by integrating those freedoms with those provided under the traditions of culture.
Analysis (i): The need to strike a balance of freedoms guaranteed by the RMI Constitution, with those rights granted through tradition and culture, continues to be part of the fabric of Marshallese government and society. The Council of Iroij and other traditional leaders continue to play an important role in this area.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective eight, emphasis on the balance of political and traditional rights and freedoms continues. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Traditional and Constitutional Freedoms Protected
• Active Council of Iroij
Vision 2018 Goal 9 – Respecting Culture and Traditions
(i) Preserve, strengthen and promote our language, traditional skills, knowledge values and customs to maintain the cultural identity of the Marshallese people.
Analysis (i): Globalization continues to make it more difficult for people around the world to maintain and pass on traditions and cultures. As the Marshall Islands, like much of the world, becomes more of a melting pot, cultural preservation of language, knowledge, values and customs will become increasingly more difficult. To date, the Marshallese have done a good job at passing on cultural values to younger generations.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective nine, emphasis on cultural preservation, in the RMI and throughout the world, is acknowledged as very valuable. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Cultural Security
• All society active in promoting and preserving Marshallese culture
Vision 2018 Goal 10 – Environmental Sustainability
(i) Developing a regulatory system that can be enforced with a high degree of compliance at all levels in order to achieve the sustainable development of our natural resources while protecting the environment from any adverse impacts.
(ii) Strengthening the relevant institutions and improve procedural mechanisms, so as to be able to secure the optimum support from both international and regional efforts, in minimizing the adverse impact of climate change.
Analysis (i): The regulatory environment in the Marshall Islands continues to be developed. Regulations regarding environment and resource development are still in the growing stages. Lack of capacity and working resources hinder the expansion of the regulatory environment, however this is an area of continued focus in the Marshall Islands Analysis (ii): The Marshall Islands has continued to work with regional and international partners with regard to regulations and climate change issues. The RMI efforts in this regard were highlighted in the 2013 Pacific Islands Forum.
National Priorities Moving Forward: With a focus on the issue as stated in Vision 2018, Objective ten, there has been continued focus on a regulatory system that protects the environment while enhancing sustainable development. This, and the continued focus on the impacts of climate change, continues to be important to the RMI. As a result of this short analysis, current priorities are summarized as follows:
• Regulatory Compliance Coordinated with Sustainable Development
- Fisheries and marine resources
- Water and land resources
- Deep Sea Mining
• Environmental Security
- Coastal security
- Land security
- Marine security
• Energy Security
- Oil and conventional energy resources
- Alternative energy resources
ANNEX 5
HEALTH AND EDUCATION INFORMATION (RMI 2011 CENSUS)
Health Information from the 2011 RMI Census:
Education Information from the 2011 RMI Census:
ANNEX 6 PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM COMMUNIQUE AND MAJURO DECLARATION
FORTY-FOURTH PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM MAJURO, REPUBLIC OF THE
MARSHALL ISLANDS 3–5 SEPTEMBER 2013
FORUM COMMUNIQUÉ
PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM SECRETARIAT
PIFS (13)8
FORTY-FOURTH PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 3 – 5 September 2013
FORUM COMMUNIQUÉ
The Forty-Fourth Pacific Islands Forum was held in Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, from 3 – 5 September 2013 and was attended by Heads of State and Government of the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Kiribati, the Republic of Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Tuvalu. The Republic of Vanuatu and Australia were represented by their Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate respectively. New Caledonia and French Polynesia attended the formal session as Associate Members. Timor-Leste, the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group, Asian Development Bank, the United Nations (UN), the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) and the World Bank attended as Observers. The Council of Regional Organisations of the Pacific (CROP): the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (PIFFA); the Pacific Islands Development Program (PIDP); the Pacific Power Association (PPA); the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC); the South Pacific Tourism Organisation (SPTO); the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP); and the University of the South Pacific (USP) were represented by their respective Heads of Organisations and senior officials. The Forum Leaders’ Retreat was held on Eneko Island on 5 September 2013.
2. Leaders expressed their deep gratitude to the President, the Government and people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands for the excellent arrangements made in hosting the 2013 Leaders’ meeting, and for the kind hospitality extended to them during their stay in Majuro.
REVIEW OF THE PACIFIC PLAN
3. Leaders welcomed the briefing provided by Sir Mekere Morauta, the Eminent Person who led the review of the Pacific Plan, on the preliminary findings and recommendations from the review. They thanked Sir Mekere Morauta and his Review Team for their extensive consultation and advisory work over the past year and the in-depth analysis that went into their preliminary findings and recommendations. Leaders looked forward to the Final Review Report of the Review Team to be submitted to the Secretariat by the end of October 2013, for onward transmission to the Leaders.
4. Leaders tasked the Forum Officials Committee to review and consider the Final Review Report once finalised and to report to Leaders on proposed next steps for their consideration at the Special Leaders’ Retreat within six months after receipt of the Final Review Report.
PACIFIC PLAN
5. Leaders recognised the key achievements outlined in the 2013 Pacific Plan Annual Progress Report. They endorsed the relevant recommendations of the Forum Disability Ministers Meeting held in Papua New Guinea in October 2012, namely:
i.) recognising the importance of high-level Pacific representation at the UN High Level Meeting on Disability to be held in New York in September 2013;
ii.) promoting and ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and developing and implementing national policies and legislation consistent with the Convention; and
iii.) recognising that a long-term approach is required to support the rights of persons with disability in the Pacific and acknowledging the good work that has been implemented under the Pacific Regional Strategy for Disability.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FORUM COMPACT
6. Leaders reviewed and endorsed the findings of the 2013 Pacific Regional MDGs Tracking Report and the 2013 Tracking the Effectiveness of Development Efforts Report and agreed to reinvigorate their commitment to accelerating the achievement of the MDGs and to send out a call to action to their respective key Ministries to double up efforts on areas where MDGs achievement is feasible. Leaders agreed to maintain strong political leadership and commitment, in close collaboration with Ministers of Finance and National Planning, if improvements to planning, budgeting, public financial management and aid management are to be realised and sustained.
THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA, DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGs), AND THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES (SIDS)
7. Leaders reiterated the importance of the discussions on the post-2015 development agenda/SDG and the opportunity for the Pacific to contribute, as well as to shape, the new development paradigm. Leaders renewed their calls for coherence of the parallel processes, ensuring important priorities that are specific to the Pacific, including disaster risk management, culture, and mental health, are included as goals and targets with indicators that are appropriate for Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs).
8. Leaders noted the vital role of CROP agencies in supporting Pacific Island Countries (PICs) to prepare for the SIDS 2014 Conference, and the need for their greater inclusion in the Conference and its preparatory processes. They also emphasised the importance of an open, transparent and inclusive discussion on the post2015 development agenda/SDGs, and directed that the Pacific position advocated in the global arena must account for all relevant Pacific regional and national meetings/consultations, including directions provided by Forum Ministers.
REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
9. Leaders noted the generous support of Tonga, and of New Zealand and the European Union, in respectively hosting the Pacific Leaders Energy Summit in Tonga and the Pacific Energy Summit in New Zealand, and welcomed the outcomes of these meetings, including commitments made by development partners.
10. Leaders supported the initiative by Tonga to establish a Pacific Regional Data Repository for Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All). Leaders noted that Tonga will launch the SE4All Declaration establishing the Repository in the margins of the 68th Session of the United Nations General Assembly.
11. Leaders also welcomed the proposal by SPC and partner agencies to organise a Pacific Energy and Transport Ministers meeting in 2014. The meeting will assess progress in the implementation of: the commitments made at the two Pacific Leaders’ Energy Summits in achieving the United Nation’s SE4All objectives; the Leaders’ declarations on energy and transport; and the Waiheke Declaration. The meeting will also reaffirm the importance of energy security, energy efficiency, and the promotion of clean and affordable energy.
12. Leaders reaffirmed the importance of infrastructure to the sustainable development of the Pacific, and the need for this to be recognised in the shaping of the post-2015 development agenda/SDGs. They urged development partners to provide ongoing support for the development of integrated Infrastructure and Investment Plans at the national and regional levels and for their utilisation as the basis for priority infrastructure maintenance, development and technical assistance.
13. Leaders requested the Forum Secretariat, in coordination with relevant CROP agencies and development partners, to work with officials to explore various funding models (such as blended finance and public-private partnerships) that will support and improve the ability of the private sector to develop, evaluate, execute and monitor infrastructure projects. They also noted the need to develop and expand Information and Communications Technology (ICT) services in the Pacific, and called for development partners’ support for identified priority funding areas, and for regular updates on progress in implementing the regional ICT plan.
REGIONAL FISHERIES
14. Leaders noted progress made in the implementation of their decisions in the fisheries sector. They considered the challenges faced in following Leaders’ directives, including slow progress in trade negotiations, limited clarity of CROP agencies’ role in SIDS preparations, difficulties in meeting export regulations with limited resources, limited information on coastal activities, limited commitment to sea cucumber stock rebuilding in some countries, and difficulties in working with cyclical funding.
15. Leaders noted the collaboration between PIFFA and the SPC in implementing key initiatives to better support members in pursuing strengthened fisheries governance and economic development, and recognised the resources required to provide ongoing support to these agencies’ work and to reduce dependency on donor funding.
16. Leaders urged Forum Island Countries (FICs) to continue to support the work of both organisations in delivering services to FICs in the fisheries sector.
CLIMATE CHANGE
17. Leaders endorsed the Majuro Declaration for Climate Leadership which is attached as Annex 1. The Declaration is intended to highlight the Leaders’ strong political commitment to be the region of Climate Leaders, and is an effort to spark a new wave of climate leadership that accelerates the reduction and phasing down of greenhouse gas pollution worldwide.
18. Climate change was discussed extensively during the meetings of the Leaders including the Smaller Island States Leaders meeting. Leaders recognised the need for strengthened national systems to plan for, access, deliver, absorb and monitor climate change financing. They called on donors and development partners to report on their climate change financing and how they differentiate or integrate such financing with their ODA allocations, noting New Zealand and Australia’s existing efforts in this regard.
19. Leaders urged donors to continue to simplify and harmonise their assessment, implementation and reporting processes for funding and assistance to reduce the complexity of current arrangements, and reiterated member countries’ preference for using national systems and modalities for channeling climate change finance guided by relevant country owned policies and plans for adaptation, mitigation and risk reduction.
OCEANSCAPE INITIATIVE
20. Leaders noted progress in implementing the Oceanscape initiative, notably the development of a draft implementation plan. Leaders endorsed the concept notes prepared to support the implementation plan, noting that these are subject to further refinement. Leaders also endorsed their use by the Marine Sector Working Group in targeting funding opportunities.
BIODIVERSITY
21. Leaders recalled their decision from their meeting in Rarotonga in 2012 of the importance of effectively dealing with invasive species at both national and regional levels. They agreed that integrated action through effective partnerships was required to actively address the escalating threat of invasive species on Pacific economies and environments, including efforts to enhance climate change adaptation, ecosystem resilience, food security, biological diversity and the development of sustainable economies.
22. Leaders encouraged SPREP and SPC, in collaboration with the Advisory Group of PICTs to further national and regional efforts to eradicate and limit the spread of invasive species.
REGIONAL TRADE
23. Leaders urged FICs that have yet to fully implement the Pacific Islands Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) and to ratify the PICTA Trade In Services Protocol to do so with urgency. They directed trade officials to actively build on the substantial progress made in the PACER Plus negotiations as directed by Forum Trade Ministers. Leaders further directed trade officials to continue to work with the European Union in concluding the negotiations on the Economic Partnership Agreement with the European Union. Leaders also noted the “Regional Culture Strategy – Investing in Pacific Cultures 2010–2020”.
REGIONAL EDUCATION
24. Leaders acknowledged with gratitude funding from the Governments of Australia and New Zealand for the Pacific Education Development Framework (PEDF). The Framework provides an overarching strategy to guide investments and initiatives in education across the region and at the country level. Leaders encouraged development partners to increase funding for the PEDF to deliver more effective educational outcomes at the national and regional level.
REGIONAL HEALTH INITIATIVES
25. Leaders noted progress made by PICTs in addressing the Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) crisis and endorsed further actions recommended through the Apia Communiqué by the 10th Pacific Ministers of Health Meeting and the 2013 Forum Economic Ministers Meeting Action Plan. Leaders also acknowledged the significant changes proposed for the governance of regional health developments, including:
i.) the development of a framework to guide health development in the Pacific and its sustainable financing, which will include major interventions outside the health sector;
ii.) the establishment of an annual consultative process involving the Heads of health ministries or departments, which will provide overall governance for the regional health sector and consider the strategic priorities and related policy issues, and advise Health Ministers accordingly;
iii.) the closer alignment of the health development process to Forum processes; and iv.) the involvement of the Forum Secretariat, together with the SPC and the World Health Organisation, in supporting the health development process.
26. Leaders noted that regional investments in responses to NCDs have helped countries establish policy and programme settings and urged increased country-level investment and accountability. Leaders also recognised the importance of sports in addressing NCDs and noted the 3rd Pacific Islands Sports Ministers Meeting Communiqué adopted at Wallis and Futuna.
REGIONAL GENDER INITIATIVES
27. Leaders recognised progress made in implementing the Pacific Leaders’ Gender Equality Declaration over the past year. Progress included the enactment of national enabling legislation of the Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women in some FICs, introduction of specific measures to increase women’s representation in parliament and local government, enactment of domestic violence legislation, and improvement in access to education for girls and women. All these were captured in the Pacific Regional MDG Tracking Report, which was focused on gender.
28. Leaders called for accelerated efforts to fulfill the Pacific Leaders’ Gender Equality Declaration priorities, with specific focus on: addressing gender inequalities; supporting women with disabilities; adopting temporary special measures to improve women’s access to employment and economic opportunities; and improving sexual reproductive health services. Leaders agreed to continue to support the integration of gender equality and women’s empowerment into sustainable development policies and decisions.
REGIONAL ASSISTANCE MISSION TO SOLOMON ISLANDS (RAMSI)
29. Leaders commended the joint achievements made by the Solomon Islands Government and RAMSI to date. They also noted the progression of RAMSI to a regional policing mission with the withdrawal of its military component, and the shift of RAMSI’s civilian development initiatives to bilateral and other donor programmes from 1 July 2013.
30. Leaders noted and supported the recommendations of the 7th Meeting of the Forum Ministerial Standing Committee on RAMSI relating to the future oversight of RAMSI activities, and agreed that the Forum Ministerial Standing Committee on RAMSI will not be required to meet again. They also agreed that the Enhanced Consultative Mechanism (ECM) on RAMSI meet in 2014 to review developments over the year and make recommendations on future arrangements, and that the report of the 2014 ECM on RAMSI be conveyed to the Forum Leaders through the Forum Regional Security Committee and the Forum Officials Committee.
31. Leaders acknowledged with appreciation ongoing financial assistance provided by the New Zealand Government, and the generous and substantial financial commitment by the Government of Australia of AUD499.8 million as continued funding for RAMSI and its successor programmes from 2013 to 2017.
32. Leaders commended with gratitude the assistance provided by all Forum contributing countries towards RAMSI and the Solomon Islands over the last ten years. They noted the experience gained by contributing police personnel and expressed the hope to build on this by countries contributing to future regional and international operations.
33. Leaders also noted the independent review of RAMSI commissioned by the Solomon Islands Government and its intention to present the findings to Forum members in the future.
FIJI
34. Leaders noted the Forum’s ongoing work to encourage and support Fiji’s return to parliamentary democracy in accordance with the Biketawa Declaration and reiterated the Forum’s intention to remain engaged with Fiji. They also noted progress made towards democratic elections to be held no later than September 2014 in line with the Forum’s principles, and the reiteration of assurances by the Government to the Forum Ministerial Contact Group on Fiji (MCG) that there would be no media restrictions in relation to the constitutional consultation process, and that elections would be free and fair.
35. Leaders noted the expectations of the people of Fiji and the international community for free and fair elections achieved through: a constitution that credibly reflects public views; an independent elections oversight mechanism and election monitoring; free and fair participation by political parties in the electoral process with fair and timely registration; independent election monitoring; freedom of expression, media and assembly in election preparations; and a general acceptance of the election outcome by the people of Fiji.
36. Leaders reaffirmed their longstanding offer to support Fiji’s early return to parliamentary democracy, including through the provision of appropriate assistance, consistent with the Forum’s underlying principles and values for respect for democracy, good governance and the rule of law. Leaders welcomed the successful visit of the Forum Ministerial Contact Group on Fiji on 12 April 2013 and considered the Group’s report to Forum Leaders, including the MCG Chair’s additional report on the situation in Fiji since the Group’s visit in April 2013.
37. Leaders welcomed the report by the MCG that Fiji has continued to make progress towards holding national elections by September 2014.
38. Leaders welcomed the release of Fiji’s new constitution on 22 August 2013, and its imminent approval by the President of Fiji. They noted that this was an important step towards free and fair elections.
39. Leaders expressed a commitment to revisit Fiji’s suspension from the Forum after free and fair elections in accordance with guidance from the Special Leaders’ Retreat in 2009 and the expectations set by the MCG during their visit in April 2013, and looked forward to inviting Fiji back to the Leaders’ Meetings.
TRANSNATIONAL AND BROADER SECURITY ISSUES
40. Leaders noted the ongoing threats to the region including from transnational organized crime groups. They emphasised the importance of interagency cooperation and information sharing at national, regional and international levels to prevent and mitigate these threats, and acknowledged the work by regional law enforcement agencies.
41. Leaders also noted the ongoing threats posed by Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) and the activities undertaken to implement the Regional Unexploded Ordnance Strategy. Leaders encouraged Members, the Forum Secretariat, development partners, international bodies and clearance service providers to continue coordinating efforts to assist affected communities.
42. Leaders welcomed the Agreement on Strengthening Implementation of the Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific. They encouraged Members to sign and ratify the Agreement to allow its entry into force, enhancing fisheries and wider law enforcement activities, and facilitate sharing of fisheries data and intelligence.
43. Leaders commended the constructive role played by Forum Member States of the United Nations in the UN negotiations for an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), consistent with the call by Forum Leaders in 2011 for Members to „ensure a strong and proactive voice in ATT negotiations’. They recalled the strong common position taken on the ATT by the Forum and the Treaty’s recent adoption and opening for signature in New York. Leaders welcomed the number of Forum members who had already signed the ATT and noted New Zealand’s intention to draft model implementing legislation and to invite Forum members to attend a regional workshop to discuss this later this year. Leaders encouraged all Forum and United Nations members to consider signing the ATT as soon as practicable.
44. Leaders encouraged all States to sign and ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) as a practical step towards nuclear disarmament, and noted the practical value and potential of the CTBT verification system, including for earthquake and tsunami warning networks in the Pacific.
45. Leaders also welcomed the outcomes of the inaugural South Pacific Defence Ministers Meeting in Nuku’alofa, Tonga, including the importance of integrating the dialogue into the wider regional architecture.
46. Leaders were informed of the region’s progress in addressing corruption through increased engagement with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), and committed to increasing efforts to address corruption, including through ratification and implementation of UNCAC.
47. Leaders noted the establishment of a Pacific Islands Forum Reference Group on Women, Peace and Security to monitor and oversee the implementation of the Regional Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, which seeks to increase the participation of women in preventing, managing, and resolving conflicts. They also acknowledged the work of the Pacific Islands Forum Reference Group to Address Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) and reinforced that all forms of SGBV should not be tolerated, and that police and community agencies have an important role in addressing SGBV.
48. Leaders noted the range of work being undertaken at the regional level to mainstream youth issues, increase youth training and employment and support youth participation in conflict prevention.
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS
49. Leaders recalled that the Republic of the Marshall Islands was placed by the international community under the trusteeship of the United Nations administered by the United States of America, both of which therefore have ongoing obligations to encourage a final and just resolution for the Marshallese people. They welcomed the recommendations in the Special Rapporteur’s report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2012 following the Special Rapporteur’s missions to the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the United States of America in March and April 2012.
50. Leaders supported bilateral and multilateral action to assist the Republic of the Marshall Islands in its efforts to engage the United States towards a justified resolution to the U.S. Nuclear Testing Programme and considered submitting letters to the U.S. Government urging the United States to take action to meaningfully address the ongoing impacts resulting from the U.S. Nuclear Testing Programme, and to the United Nations Secretary-General to address the ongoing impacts of nuclear testing in the Pacific.
51. Leaders also agreed to stand in solidarity with the people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands as they face the challenges of overcoming the nuclear legacy.
POST-FORUM DIALOGUE PARTNERS
52. Leaders agreed to admit Cuba as the fifteenth Post-Forum Dialogue Partner, and noted that they will attend the 2014 Post-Forum Dialogue Plenary.
53. Leaders agreed to defer consideration of Spain’s application for Post-Forum Dialogue membership to their next meeting.
NEW CALEDONIA
54. Leaders welcomed the successful visit of the Forum Ministerial Committee to New Caledonia on 17–19 July 2013, and endorsed the Forum Chair’s report on the visit.
SIXTH PACIFIC LEADERS MEETING (PALM 6)
55. Leaders welcomed Japan’s support for the Pacific Islands Forum and its intention to promote coordination between the Pacific Islands Forum and the PALM processes to further enhance cooperation with the Pacific region. Leaders welcomed Japan’s initiative to hold the second Ministerial Interim Meeting in 2013 in order to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the key PALM 6 outcomes.
COUNTRY INITIATIVES
56. Leaders noted the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands’ briefing on, and agreed to monitor, the Nansen Initiative and Ocean 21 initiative.
CANDIDACIES
57. Leaders reaffirmed support for New Zealand’s candidature for the United Nations Security Council to maintain a Pacific voice in the world’s primary body to address international peace and security. Australia thanked Forum members for their support in its successful bid for United Nations Security Council membership.
OUTCOMES OF THE SIS LEADERS MEETING
58. Leaders endorsed the outcomes of the SIS Leaders Meeting held in Majuro on 3 September 2013.
OTHER MATTERS
59. Leaders noted with concern the situation in Syria. They expressed their abhorrence at the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Government. They called on all members of the United Nations Security Council, individually and collectively, to provide leadership in resolving this significant threat to international peace and security and to holding the Syrian Government to account for its actions.
APPRECIATION
60. Leaders commended the outgoing Chair, Honourable Henry Puna, Prime Minister of Cook Islands, and his Government for their leadership of the Forum over the past year.
VENUE FOR NEXT MEETING
61. Leaders welcomed the offer of the Republic of Palau to host the 2014 Forum.
Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat Eneko Island, Republic of the Marshall Islands 5 September 2013.
MAJURO DECLARATION FOR CLIMATE LEADERSHIP
1. Climate change has arrived. It is the greatest threat to the livelihoods, security and well-being of the peoples of the Pacific and one of the greatest challenges for the entire world.
2. There is an overwhelming scientific consensus that escalating greenhouse gas emissions continue to cause the sharp rise in average global temperatures over the past century, the alarming acidification of our oceans, the rapid loss of polar sea ice, sea-level rise, and the striking incidence of more frequent and extreme weather events all over the world.
3. On 9 May 2013, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide measured near the summit of Mauna Loa in Hawai’i exceeded 400 parts per million for the first time since measurements began. In crossing this historic threshold, the world entered a new danger zone. Unless we quickly change course, global average temperatures are projected to rise by 4°C or more above pre-industrial levels by the end of the Century, resulting in unprecedented human and environmental impacts.
4. We, the Leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum, underline the need for urgent action at all levels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions commensurate with the science and to respond urgently and sufficiently to the social, economic and security impacts of climate change to ensure the survival and viability of all Pacific small island developing States, in particular low-lying atoll States, and other vulnerable countries and regions worldwide.
5. At the same time, we recognize that the necessary energy revolution and economic transformation to low-carbon development is an unprecedented opportunity to enhance our security, protect and ensure the sustainability of our natural resources and environment, and to improve our people’s health.
Our Responsibility to Act
6. We confirm the responsibility of all to act to urgently reduce and phase down greenhouse gas pollution in order to avert a climate crisis for present and future generations.
7. The responsibility of all to act falls to every government, every company, every organization and every person with the capacity to do so, both individually and collectively.
Our Commitment to be Climate Leaders
8. We commit to be Climate Leaders.
9. To lead is to act. In supporting this Declaration, a government, economic entity, company, civil society organization or individual commits to demonstrate climate leadership through action that contributes to the urgent reduction and phase down of greenhouse gas pollution.
10. Recognizing our unique vulnerability to climate change, the predicted catastrophic impacts on the security and livelihoods of our people, and the significant benefits that come with our transition to renewable, clean and sustainable energy sources, we, the Leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum, confirm our climate leadership in the form of the commitments listed at the end of this Declaration. We also want to do more.
11. We call on our partners to enhance, accelerate and ensure the effective delivery of their support for the design and implementation of the commitments of the Pacific small island developing States.
12. We also call on others, in particular our Post-Forum Dialogue Partners, to contribute to the urgent reduction and phase down of greenhouse gas pollution. Those who support this Declaration will list specific commitments that contribute more than previous efforts to the urgent reduction and phase down of greenhouse gas pollution, and will submit them to the Chair of the Pacific Islands Forum for listing with this Declaration.
13. This Declaration is a platform for an upward spiral of action to urgently reduce and phase down greenhouse gas pollution. Those who support this Declaration are strongly encouraged to continue to scale-up their efforts by submitting for listing further specific commitments that contribute more than previous efforts to the urgent reduction and phase down of GHG pollution.
14. In addition, we commit to accelerate and intensify our efforts to prepare for and adapt to the intensifying impacts of climate change, and to further develop and implement policies, strategies and legislative frameworks, with support where necessary, to climate-proof our essential physical infrastructure, adapt our key economic sectors and ensure climate-resilient sustainable development for present and future generations.
15. This Declaration will be presented by the Chair of the Pacific Islands Forum to the Secretary-General of the United Nations as a contribution to his efforts to catalyze ambitious climate action and mobilize political will for a universal, ambitious and legally-binding climate change agreement by 2015.
16. This Declaration and the actions under it are intended to complement, strengthen and augment processes under way and commitments already made, including those under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol.
17. We agree to review the status and implementation of this Declaration at the 45th Pacific Island Forum Leaders’ meeting.
Adopted in Majuro, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, on this, the 5th day of September, 2013
ANNEX 7 ADB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
ADB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is providing a three year Capacity Building Technical Assistance (TA) to be used in the NSP monitoring and implementation phase, following the approval of the NSP. The TA includes capacity building for EPPSO and for RMI government ministries/agencies.
The central focus of the TA is capacity development. As per EPPSO recommendations, the advisor will be working under the guidance of EPPSO, and also working closely with EPPSO staff and relevant government ministries/agencies to support the development of processes and systems necessary to implement and monitor the NSP. Specifically, the advisor will focus on the following tasks and activities:
(i) Work directly with EPPSO staff in order to build the capacity of EPPSO staff (specifically, the Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Aid Coordination Division Head) with regard to M&E, reporting and strategic development planning by providing mentoring and skills transfer through on-the-job training and other capacity building methods.
(ii) With EPPSO staff, build the capacity of relevant government ministry/agency staff in strategic development planning, M&E, data collection and reporting by providing mentoring and skills transfer through on-the-job training and other capacity building methods.
(iii) Support the formulation or revisions of ministries/agencies three-year rolling strategic plans that are being used to implement ministry objectives and track progress against the NSP; and further support data collection in the ministries that track progress with regard to national planning objectives.
(iv) Strengthen the capacity of EPPSO and other ministry/agency staff with regard to M&E of the NSP plan by:
(a) Developing a system to track progress using the indicators related to the objectives of the NSP.
(b) Producing an annual progress report on NSP implementation and progress.
ANNEX 8 CORE INDICATORS
EPPSO will use a mix of core indicators during the monitoring of the NSP. The core indicators will continue to be reviewed for relevance to the development objectives of the RMI NSP.
ANNEX 9 MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
The Millennium Development Goals
1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
- Halve the proportion of people living in extreme poverty by 2015.
- Halve the proportion of people who suffer from hunger by 2015.
2. Achieve universal primary education
• Ensure that by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary school education.
3. Promote gender equality and empower women
• Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015.
4. Reduce child mortality.
• Reduce by two-thirds the under-5 mortality rate by 2015 (health).
5. Improve maternal health
• Reduce by three-quarters the maternal mortality ratio by 2015 (health).
6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
- By 2015 halt and begin to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS.
- By 2015 halt and begin to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases.
7. Ensure environmental sustainability
- Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programs and reverse the loss of environmental resources.
- Halve by 2015 the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe e drinking water and basic sanitation.
- By 2015 achieve a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers.
8. Create a global partnership for development with targets for aid, trade and debt relief
- Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable non discriminatory trading and financial system.
- Address the special needs both of the least developed countries and of landlocked and small island developing countries.
- Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable.
- In cooperation with developing countries, develop and implement strategies for decent and productive work for youth
- In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable essential drugs in developing countries.
- In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications.
ANNEX 10 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS MEMOS AND ATTENDANCE
FIRST STAKEHOLDER FORUM ATTENDANCE (14 JUNE 2013)
SECTORAL CONSULTATION ATTENDANCE (18–20 J UNE 2013)
SECOND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ATTENDANCE (9 AUGUST 2013)
THIRD STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ATTENDANCE (5 NOVEMBER 2013)
NSP PRESENTATION TO MAYORS CONFERENCE (21 NOVEMBER 2013)
NSP PRESENTATION TO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXECUTIVE BOARD AND PRIVATE SECTOR (4 DECEMBER 2013)
RMI NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN FINAL CONSULTATION (11 DECEMBER 2013)